• Peter1986C
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    So they are now kind of like Fedora or Linux Mint. On the upside, that could mean that if (any of) the Debian forks would somehow collapse, it should be easier for users to go “back” to Debian.

    • @Seldon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      The benefit using Linux Mint (at least what I have seen) is that multimedia codecs are optional on install, which is totally fine in my opinion.

      • Peter1986C
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Mint is a fine distro. My comment was more like a “what if” scenario.

    • @Whom@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Keep in mind that this doesn’t stop you from easily making a fully free system and debian still has a clear separation between free and non-free components, the difference is just collapsing the confusing installer situation into one and what that offers you by default.

      I understand if you’d prefer a more pure approach and I respect that, but it doesn’t seem that impactful to an existing debian user unless you’re against the idea of your distro more clearly offering non-free firmware options. For many users, this isn’t even a matter of a performance hit…it’s being able to boot into debian and use it for anything in the first place.