Is Nano better than Vim?
@memes

  • Dessalines
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    May I suggest: Helix . I used vim for years, but I’ve been enjoying the switch to this.

      • Dessalines
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Its better, has first-class multi-cursor support, and you don’t need to install any plugins to get it usable. Also has LSP support for pretty much every language. IMO its a true successor to vim, which is so old now its like a leaky roof that needs constant repairs (in the form of plugins).

  • CyclohexaneM
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Nano is only better in having a lower learning curve, and still being sufficient for most people just wanting to get the job done.

    Vim is way more capable and feature rich (especially after you extend with plugins), much more satisfying to use once you get the hang of it, and can be much faster

  • @inkwiwtba@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    you can really get the job done sticking to sed, echo, cat and grep. an even bigger brain solution

  • @nickapos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    You should use what you feel most comfortable with. Also it is not a binary choice. I use vim and vscode and emacs. Vim is already available in all remote systems which is why it is my first choice when I am debugging something. I use vscode as an IDE and emacs as a general purpose editor. Haven’t used nano for ages but it is a nice editor nevertheless.

  • Elijah Nelson
    link
    fedilink
    211 months ago

    The comparison between Nano and Vim depends on individual preferences and specific use cases. Both Nano and Vim are popular text editors but have different features mapquest driving directions and design philosophies.

    • @ivonaroma@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      Well, if you want a no-frills editor for basic tasks like editing configuration files, Nano is probably a better choice due to its simplicity. However, if you’re a developer or power user who needs advanced features, extensive customization on the site, and plugin support, Vim will likely be a better long-term option despite its steeper learning curve.

  • @LoryGallante@r.nf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This is a good post. This post gives rice purity test truly quality information. I’m definitely going to look into it. Really very useful tips are provided here. Thank you so much. Keep up the good works.

    • grin
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      @anders @LoryGallante You could be so much luckier if you would invest your rice into my crypto! You can get rich fast! Or Faster! Light, I mean, so fast that you will be rich faster than a cezium atom finishes its resonance cycle! And you only need a meager $9999.95 investment! And you will be bazillionaire! #truestory

  • James Richardson
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    @anders I always go with nano as, to me, it is easier to use and powerful enough for my needs. What features of vim make it seem “better” to anyone?

  • nanook
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Mostly things like yank cut-n-paste, and it deals properly with international two-byte character sets, but nvi has those same advantages PLUS has fully implemented ex command set. Nano is fine for quick notes or sending an e-mail but not so good for editing large sets of code. Anyway, he probably is thinking of another chick because “she” looks too much like a “he”.

  • Robert Mitchell
    link
    fedilink
    111 months ago

    Yes. Thank you for providing this information. Good fortune. I also blog, and I’d really like more people to read my most recent article about rooftop snipers .