If in any game ever (Souls or otherwise) you see “Does not open from this side” or similar when you try to open a door, you must scream from the top of your lungs “CURSE YOU MIYAZAKI!”

It’s way too early in the day to be hit this hard right in the feels my man

so I can retire.

So you can become homeless you mean :p

One thing I’ve also noticed is people doing code reviews using ai to pad their stats or think they are helping out. At best it’s stating the obvious, wasting resources to point out what doesn’t need pointing out. At worst it’s a giant waste of time based on total bullshit the ai made up.

I kinda understand why people would think LLMs are able to generate and evaluate code. Because they throw simple example problems at them and they solve them without much issue. Sometimes they make obvious mistakes, but these are easily corrected. This makes people think LLMs are basically able to code, if it can solve even some harder example problems, surely they are at least as good as beginner programmers right? No, wrong actually. The reason the LLM can solve the example problem, is because that example (or a variation) was contained within its training data. It knows the answer not by deduction or by reason, it knows the answer by memorization. Once you start actually programming in the real world, it’s nothing like the examples. You need to account for an existing code base, with existing rules, standards and limitations. You need to evaluate which solution out of your toolbox to apply. Need to consider the big picture as well as small details. You need to think of the next guy working with the code, because more often than not, that next guy is you. LLMs crumble in a situation like this, they don’t know about all the unspoken things, they haven’t trained on the code base you are working with.

There’s a book I’m fond of called Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture by Martin Fowler. I always used to joke it contained the answer to any problem a software engineer ever comes across. The only trick is to choose the correct answer. LLMs are like this, they have all these patterns memorized and choose which answer best fits the question. But it doesn’t understand why, what the upsides and downsides are for your specific situation. What the implications of the selected answer are going forward. Or why this pattern over another. When the LLM answers you can often prompt it to produce an answer with a completely different pattern applied. In my opinion it’s barely more useful than the book and in many ways much worse.

Yes, because once you’ve found it, you stop looking.

Yeah I don’t really see how that’s possible. Even if you get a material that’s able to harvest at 20% efficiency, getting the energy out is a big issue. It’s a lot of power and transporting it through a layer a few micron thick is very rough and leads to huge losses.

I also don’t know what “math” they actually did. I think it was some back of the napkin extrapolations and not actual data. For example they state: “one scientist suggested covering an entire car with the new solar paint, ramping up the surface area to more than 11m2” That leads me to believe they didn’t actually do anything but were just extrapolating and speculating for the press.

They also state: “scientists hardwired the body panels to the Benz’s high-voltage battery”. This makes zero sense. In order for energy to flow from a solar panel into for example a battery, the voltage of the panel needs to be higher than the voltage of the battery. Otherwise the current will flow in the wrong direction. But Mercedes EQS batteries run at 400 volt, you can’t connect “directly” to the battery unless you want the panel to explode and the car to catch fire. And even if you connect it directly into some charger system that can convert the voltage from the panel into something the battery can use to charge, you wouldn’t want to do it like that. Including a voltage optimizer in the system is key for getting efficiency out of a solar panel.

I think some journalist misunderstood some Merc tech demo and made up this BS story.

Yeah this is total BS.

The sun delivers about 1.3kW of energy per square meter and an average car takes up about 8 square meters of space. So that’s about 11kW to work with, but even very efficient solar panels only harvest about 20% of that. So that leaves us with about 2.2kW to work with. Now in order to convert that energy into something usable and charge the battery, more losses are added, depending on the situation this would be around 20%, leaving 1.76kW. This means charging a 50kWh battery would take around 28 hours. Obviously we can only expect around 6 hours of really good sun on an average day, with the rest of the day having much less energy available. So charging the car would take several days in perfect conditions. If it’s cloudy, if it’s raining, if you’ve got shade over the car, if you drive the car etc. it will take more time to charge it.

In reality however, this is with modern commercial grade equipment, oriented perfectly to the sun at the proper angle. Putting that in a car isn’t possible. Stuff is going to get hot, which leads to reduced efficiency, active cooling costs energy so that’s probably not a good solution. The car isn’t going to have all of it’s surface facing the sun, by definition a part of it is going to be in it’s own shade. If the sun is perfectly overhead for max efficiency on the roof, the sides aren’t going to get anything. Angles are going to be wrong and people prefer to park their cars in the shade or under cover. Cars also tend to be used, so they get pretty dirty driving around, that reduces efficiency further. So if they get half of what I described, they would be doing real good. Just takes a week to charge the car, but still, doing good.

But then there’s the real kicker. It isn’t possible to get anywhere near 20% out of a paint or surface finish. Modern solar panels have many tricks to get their efficiency as high as 20% (and even nearing 30% with the newest techniques, but that isn’t commercially viable at the moment). Solar paints are way worse and do badly even in perfect lab settings. One of the issues is the energy generation isn’t as optimal to begin with, but another issue is getting the energy transported out of the material is problematic. This leads to efficiency numbers in the 1% range. This means going from charging in a week, it will take months, if it charges at all.

Except for niche use cases, putting solar on anything except roofs usually makes no sense at all. It’s handy for camping, on top of the RV or for example on a boat, where having a little bit of DC is handy when no other sources is available. But when there is a roof available, just put it on the roof and use the power from there.

Yes.

Even in a unjust world mob justice isn’t justice. This means a mob deciding someone is guilty and acting out punishment is unjust. But also a mob deciding a crime should go unpunished is unjust.

There’s plenty wrong with how insurance works and plenty wrong with the justice system. But instead of giving up, we should be trying to fix these issues. It’s all to easy to give in to our basic instincts and point to someone to blame. We punish them instead of fixing the issues. Killing one ceo might feel good, but it doesn’t really change the big picture and in fact constitutes layer upon layer of failure. We should be better than that. History is full of people (singular and groups) being used as a scape goat to deflect and feel like something is being done, whilst in fact not actually fixing anything and just feeding hate.

Also in a capitalist world, the people with the most money have the most power. If we collectively decide it’s open warfare, purge style distopia, they are going to have the upper hand. So purely from a self interest point of view, it would be better to work on fixing shit instead of reverting to monke.

Because it’s broad blanket statements that boil down to: “Just do better”.

I have had some experience working with logistical processes for example. They always have their flaws, but trying to improve them beyond some point quickly becomes impossible. It’s easy to make big gains at first, but once you get into the weeds more and more small issues start popping up. It gets to the point solving these issues is more trouble than it’s worth.

So when the thing says we need to reduce food waste by having better logistics for example, I call bullshit. Modern logistical processes are often at the max of what’s possible. And we saw with covid how fragile those processes are. We’ve sacrificed flexibility for efficiency and as the world became weird for a while, the whole thing crumbled and still hasn’t fully recovered.

15C while I’m away, 17C while I’m in. Gas is expensive and my home isn’t that well insulated. I just put on a warm vest and it’s fine by me.

With millenials often there’s a split made between the early millenials and later millenials. People born before 1990 will have gone through a lot of early life and education without the internet. Where people born in 1990 and later will have had internet for most their childhood and education. This means the early millenials are a lot like gen-X and the later are much more distinct.

I like the online part just fine, but it feels like a completely different game. When I play offline, it’s like I’m in the world of the Lands Between. I’m myself on an epic quest, even though I have a meme name and a meme face. When playing online it’s like I’m playing a video game where my character does things.

I usually prefer to play offline, even though I like the online parts.

And I love playing seamless coop with a friend, it’s like going on an epic quest together.

The correct amount of Nazi rallies is 0

You say that, but without the US military support it will be rough for Ukraine. The EU has spent a bunch of money to get all other kinds of aid to Ukraine, much more than the US. But the US has supplied more military support, more than the EU. If the US stops helping out, the EU will probably not be able to fill the gap. And Trump can put pressure on the EU by threatening to pull out of Nato again. If Russia decides to invade more countries and the US leaves Nato hanging, the EU is in trouble. Now these are a lot of ifs and since Trump has been elected the EU has been preparing. Plus laws have been passed in the US to prevent Trump from pulling out of Nato, but you know how much Trump cares about laws. Once the EU feels like they don’t need the support from the US any more, Trump has nothing to say anymore, but we ain’t there yet.

Yuki is super inconsistent, sometimes he’s ultra fast, sometimes he’s nowhere doing his Mazespin impression. Red Bull needs a solid second driver to bring in the points and back up Verstappen. Yuki isn’t it.

I’ve also been involved with projects that were retro-activly renamed to AI. Implemented a new oldskool search algorithm? That’s AI now! Simple decision tree with static weights? AI!

Nobody wants investors or customers to think you’re doing a bad job not putting AI in stuff, even if it doesn’t really help or isn’t a use case for anything related to AI.

Wait? You guys have intelligence?

If it works and it’s stupid - It’s still stupid but damn those make for good pictures on the internet

Brighter? Thank god Bandai Namco fixed their logo for Elden Ring, that flashbang can give you eye damage.