The science advisor must have been out that day

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      We had like, so much potential energy in motion before you got here with your negativity, man.

    • Affine Connection@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Actually, negative absolute temperature is quite real in certain non-equilibrium systems, and does not imply negative energy.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Negative temperature means that the system loses entropy if you put more energy in. This means that negative temp is hotter than any positive temperature, in the sense that if you put two systems in thermal contact, heat will flow from negative to positive.

      In the continuum of temperatures, positive absolute zero is the coldest, going up to positive infinity Kelvins. Then minus infinity Kelvins is just slightly hotter than positive infinity. Then it keeps going up to negative absolute zero, the hottest temperature.

      These infinities keep cropping up because the reciprocal of temperature is actually the more fundamental physical quantity.

      • orthen@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Negative temperature means that the system loses entropy if you put more energy in.

        Of course that’s basically the same as the “you travel backwards in time if you move faster than light” in the sense that these are things the math does, if you put in these totally unphysical values, while the same set of rules that give this predictions say you can’t reach these values.

          • orthen@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Ah, yes. You’re referring to these gases with an inverted energy distribution. I guess that’s a question of definition, since they don’t exist in the thermodynamic limit.

      • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        These infinities keep cropping up because the reciprocal of temperature is actually the more fundamental physical quantity.

        I’m interested in reading more about this. I’m looking at the Wikipedia page for “Thermodynamic beta” now. Is that what you’re talking about?

        • orthen@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes that’s it. Fun fact: The entropy is basically the most fundamental thermodynamical quantity, but was discoverd long after temperature and energy. If that would not be the case, we might measure temperature in eV / kByte, since the unit of temperature is energy / entropy and the unit of entropy is information.

          In a sense, the existence of the Boltzmann constant is a historical accident, because temperature and energy have been discovered after entropy.