• petunia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Speaking from experience, they could fix their spam and abuse woes very easily by just closing new signups or restricting it in some way. Simplest would be invite-only (built-in feature of Mastodon), or restrict the signups page based on IP range whitelist/blacklist.

    EDIT: Their domain has been reinstated, and they disabled open signups. New registrations now require moderator approval https://pawoo.net/@pawoo_support/111249170584706318

    :pawoo: Announcement! Thank you for always using Pawoo. Due to server congestion, new registrations will now require approval by a moderator. Thank you very much for your cooperation.

      • eee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The nature of a site like reddit (and lemmy and all other alternatives) means a large userbase is necessary. Not at the expense of CSAM, but also everyone trying to gatekeep lemmy doesn’t realise that we’ll die a slow death unless the fediverse grows by at least 10-20x.

        • themusicman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Doesn’t have to be all on one instance though. Instances shouldn’t grow beyond what they can admin/moderate

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        I swear, Lemmy users act like they are completely in favor of an instance of 40 users and a submission every other week. Seeing scale as inherently bad.

        Lemmy will fucking roll over and die within the year.

    • Furball@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m pretty sure they were complicit in this and were not really trying to fight it.

      • Solarius@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Actual CSAM on pawoo wasn’t even a problem. It was just spam from feds or scammers.

      • petunia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Absolutely brain-dead speculation based on literally nothing. Complicit in what??? The current owner is a very public figure, so they gain nothing and have everything to lose. It’s just pure incompetence and mismanagement.

  • Dame @lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Why are there people downvoting people commenting about not wanting CSAM?

    • endhits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      CSAM is Child Sexual Exploitation Material

      People prefer using this term over CP because the word “porn” is considered too soft. Porn is generally a consensual, adult medium made with adults for adults. CP is not that, it’s first and foremost harm of a child.

      • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 months ago

        Another reason is that “CP” got jokingly coopted by abusers in the form of various dogwhistles (e.g.: “cheese pizza”). It made more sense to adopt a new acronym rather than try to uphold any sense of decorum while sharing ownership of the term w/ edgelords & predators.

      • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        That’s strange to me, because Child Porn sounds revolting to me but CSAM sounds like something I can treat with aspirin.

    • TheGreatFox@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nah. They’re lax about loli. Which, as distasteful as it is, does not involve any harm to actual children. They do go after actual CSAM.

      • Dame @lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not really, they’re lax about CSAM and didn’t even have laws until 2016-2017. Even then the laws are lax

      • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        They go after it mainly to appease external forces like other countries objecting to it, but people who are convicted often get very light sentences.