Holy crap, that’s a lot of work to get a roll of filament. That’s only economical if your time is worth nothing. Ugh.

  • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    tbf, you wouldn’t do this because it’s cheaper, you’d do it because it’s more ecologically friendly and it helps make your 3d printer a bit more sustainable.

    But at 20 bucks for a spool of thread, you won’t be coming out ahead economically by recycling, I agree.

    • dawnerd@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’d be fun to mess around with if it wasn’t 12-18k for the setup.

    • thantik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s also not more ecologically friendly – you’ve gotta use near 80% virgin material with 20% regrind for a good quality product. All you’re doing is bringing its production into your house on a smaller, more inefficient scale. And then you’re paying this dipshit here $20k so you can save $5 on your 1kg of PLA.

      To be fair, however, it is good if you’re testing small batches of filament formulations because you’re running an actual production line though.

      • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        ngl, I’ve never tried it and I doubt I’m about to start, so prints go into the recycle bin so they can get dumped in the landfill with the rest of the recycling.

        But at the very least, it’s a better practice to use PLA as your main choice.

        • thantik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Strangely enough, ABS is better for the environment, as it’s one of the few actual materials that get recycled…

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      No, the ecologically friendly option is to send it to the recycling.

      • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Assuming it’s recycled instead of sent to a landfill.

        Once you find out about how the business of recycling works that’s often not such a certain assumption.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          3D printing waste is a clean waste. It doesn’t have food leftovers on it, weird paint or anything else which will render it unrecyclable. Also PLA just goes into a composter.

          • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Great argument. Bit of a problem though: you don’t need to convince me or the fediverse. You need to convince plastic recyclers not to just take the strange plastic like thing that isn’t labeled and isn’t common and just send it to the landfill.

            The journey of recycling doesn’t end the moment that a potentially recyclable object ends up in your recycle bin. In order to be recycled, A bunch of things need to go right, and if they don’t then your “recycling” just enters the local landfill, if you’re lucky. If you’re unlucky, your “recycling” will end up in a cargo container on its way to a landfill in some third world country somewhere.

            https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jun/17/recycled-plastic-america-global-crisis

      • Piecemakers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re naive if you think that “recycling” hasn’t been a complete smokescreen for decades, FFS.

  • rasterweb@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    “That’s only economical if your time is worth nothing.” Well, we should all be able to live lives where we can pursue things that do not have monetary rewards. Obviously not everyone is in that position but perhaps for David Florian exploring and learning and trying things is what makes him happy. Of course for him it probably makes money as well, even if indirectly. The fact that his video got shared means more people will see it, and more views means more money, so there’s the value for David Florian. It’s also worth considering that in science, it’s all about trying things and gathering information that will hopefully lead to new (and hopefully lower cost) capabilities.

  • stalfoss@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    To be fair, most hobby 3d printing is only economical if your time is worth nothing

    • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      True, in some sense. However, I can’t get a lot of the things that I can 3d print. There’s literally no way to buy them.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Someone at McGill university figured out how to recycle wind turbine blades into 3d printer filament. However, a single blade made enough filament that it’s length could go to the moon and back. From one blade!