Mark Rutte, the Dutch prime minister, has announced his resignation and that of his cabinet, citing irreconcilable differences within his four-party coalition about how to control immigration.

The decision on Friday by the Netherlands’ longest-serving premier means the country will face a general election later this year for the 150-seat lower house of parliament.

“It is no secret that the coalition partners have very different views on migration policy,” Rutte told reporters in The Hague. “And today, unfortunately, we have to draw the conclusion that those differences are irreconcilable. That is why I will immediately … offer the resignation of the entire cabinet to the king in writing.”

Rutte said he would lead a caretaker government until the election that would focus on tasks including continued support for Ukraine’s war effort.

Opposition lawmakers wasted no time in calling for fresh elections.

Geert Wilders, leader of the anti-immigration Party for Freedom, tweeted: “Quick elections now.” Jesse Klaver, leader of the Green Left party also called for elections and told Dutch broadcaster NOS: “This country needs a change of direction.”

Rutte had presided over late-night meetings on Wednesday and Thursday that failed to result in a deal on migration policy. More talks were held on Friday evening, and he had declined to answer questions about the issue at his weekly press conference before the discussions.

“Everybody wants to find a good, effective solution that also does justice to the fact that this is about human lives,” finance minister Sigrid Kaag, a member of the centrist D66 party, said before the talks began.

The discussions underscored ideological divisions in the coalition between the partner parties that do not support a strict crackdown on migration – D66 and fellow centrist party ChristenUnie, or Christian Union – and the two that favour tougher measures – Rutte’s conservative People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy and the Christian Democrats.

The coalition tried for months to hash out a deal to reduce the flow of new migrants arriving in the country of nearly 18 million people.

Proposals reportedly included creating two classes of asylum – a temporary one for people fleeing conflicts and a permanent one for people trying to escape persecution – and reducing the number of family members who are allowed to join asylum seekers in the Netherlands.

Last year, hundreds of asylum seekers were forced to sleep outdoors in squalid conditions near an overcrowded reception centre as the number of people arriving in the Netherlands outstripped the available beds. Dutch aid agencies provided assistance.

More than 21,500 people from outside Europe sought asylum in the Netherlands in 2022, according to the country’s statistics office. Tens of thousands more moved to the Netherlands to work and study.

The numbers have put a strain on housing that already was in short supply in the densely populated country.

Rutte’s government worked for a law that could compel municipalities to provide accommodations for newly arrived asylum seekers, but the legislation has yet to pass through both houses of parliament.

The prime minister also promoted European Union efforts to slow migration to the 27-nation bloc.

Rutte, 56, visited Tunisia last month with his Italian counterpart and the president of the EU’s executive commission to offer more than €1bn (£850m) in financial aid to rescue the North African nation’s teetering economy and to stem migration from its shores to Europe.

Rutte’s coalition government, the fourth he has led, took office in January 2022 following the longest coalition negotiations in Dutch political history.

There will likely be an election for the 150-seat lower house later this year amid a polarised and splintered political landscape. Rutte’s cabinet would likely remain in office as a caretaker administration until a new government was formed.

During provincial elections earlier this year, a populist pro-farmer party put Rutte’s party into second place. The defeat was seen as a possible incentive for Rutte to do his utmost to hold together his coalition until its term ends in 2025.

  • Fenzik@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is a pretty big surprise for a lot of people, immigration is not the thorniest issue this cabinet have dealt with… most likely a political move from at least one of the parties to break the coalition over this and try to snag more seats and a more favourable coalition next go around as opposed to a true vehement disagreement

    • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      yeah, lets not pretend the VVD has actual ideological issues with reunification of refugee families, or an ideological backbone in general

      theyre banking on bullying refugees selling well to the voters theyve lost to pvv, fvd and BBB, a coalition that lets them sit more comfortably and with even less critical actors, and pushing back all the important, time sensitive shite they dont want to work on as a happy bonus

      what makes it even more transparent is the surprise, unlike every other actual difference in opinion, the vvd has opted to just instantly dissolve the cabinet after, like, a day

      pretending that this is about a difference in opinion is basically just a courtesy at this point

    • Imperial_Genesis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Guaranteed. They saw an opportunity to get more seats and they took it and screwed the rest basically.

      Probably we’re going to see a coalition of VVD and BBB after the next election, together with the CDA.

      • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        i cant wait for the several million dollar investigation into whether they can make the rising seas, homelessness, carcinogenic air and taking a shit at the binnenhof Rendabel™

        • Imperial_Genesis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well maybe Rutte will leave then if there is no other way for them to form a government. We’ll see how it goes, if BBB is going to be part of the government I hope for them they will not experience a LPF like event where all kinds of internal struggles happen within a very very short amount of time.

    • SolarNialamide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t get how they would snag more seats in an election right after the ridiculous domination of BBB though? Those people are still high on that win and see a giant chance to take way more political power. If that was the intention they should’ve waited at least a few more months or a year for that to die down a little or maybe even see some failures in the provinces here and there for BBB coalitions. I’m honestly scared as shit that BBB is now gonna be huge in the Tweede Kamer as well and we’ll have a coalition of BBB, PVV and CDA or some other nightmare shit.

      • Fenzik@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess maybe VVD want to try with BBB and do something “business friendly” (gag) while fully ignoring the environment

  • Digitalprimate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    While this is a transparent and shitty power plant by the loathsome VVD, I am hoping it backfires. D66 is almost strong enough to lead a coalition of reasonable parties. I mean, it’s not the shift far left that I would like (and think we need), but it’d be a hell of a lot better than VVD + to the right of VVD remaining in power. I don’t think the BBB has a lot of momentum left either.

  • Zoutpeper@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    He’s only at Rutte IV so if he wants to reach Rutte X and still retire, he needs to hurry those election cycles