The amount the company I work for did in stock buybacks last year, were that wealth instead taxed or returned to the people, would have been able to:

Build 10,000,000 sqft of high schools, or, around 88 $45,000,000 high schools.

Or

Could have provided ~6.3 million women with young children or infants with supplemental health and nutrition through the WIC program for 8.5 months

Or

80 $50 million mental health facilities

Or

According to Dept of HUD, would have been 20% of the total needed to eradicate homelessness entirely from the country

Or

Fed 363,636 families of 4, for a total of 1.45 million people, for an entire year.

Or

Put solar panels on 250,000 homes.

My company did an entire BILLION less in buybacks. Adding up the top 5 companies I could find data for, we get the following: ~$56billion buybacks, which could have instead been used to:

Build 140,000,000 sqft of high schools, or, around 1200 $45,000,000 high schools.

Or

Could have provided ~6.3 million women with young children or infants with supplemental health and nutrition through the WIC program for 9.91 YEARS.

Or

1120 $50 million mental health facilities

Or

According to Dept of HUD, would have been 280% of the total needed to eradicate homelessness entirely from the country,

Or

Fed 5,090,904 families of 4, for a total of 71.2 million people, or 20% of the entire population of the country for an entire year.

Or

Put solar panels on 3.5 million homes.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.worldEnglish
    32·
    11 months ago

    End stock buy backs, force companies to reinvest that money into their employees.

      • BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tfOPEnglish
        11·
        11 months ago

        Isn’t it? The guy I stole the text from on Mastodon did a good job. I didn’t change the numbers to reflect my company, but it’s pretty close. I think we did like… 3.25b in buybacks where I work.

          • BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tfOPEnglish
            6·
            11 months ago

            It definitely doesn’t help. My company had a 1.2b loss last year, laid off 500 people, gave out 3% raises in a 8% inflation environment, but did over $3b in buybacks. They don’t give a FUUUUUCK If I live or die.

    • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.socialEnglish
      2·
      11 months ago

      I partially disagree with this because it stops companies from being able to go private if they want. Hell, the original point of investing is that you believed in the company’s goal(s) and wanted to support them. In return you get to hold onto part of the company as collateral until they (hopefully) pay you back, with interest. At least that’s what I was taught growing up, but considering how everyone else views investing, I’m starting to have my doubts as to the accuracy of what I was taught. Anyway, as such, banning stock buybacks seems to run contrary to this and only further cements the idea that the stock market is a capitalist free money machine.

      HOWEVER

      A company shouldn’t be able to buy back stocks and then immediately turn around and sell them again. If a company wants to buy back stocks, those stocks should be locked for, say, 10yrs. That way it doesn’t affect a company seeking to go private, but it does stop companies from trying to profit off them.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        11 months ago

        Thats the problem. You can’t give any corporate entity an inch nowadays because then they lobby for a mile. No stock buybacks, ya’ll couldn’t handle it without fucking everyone else in the ass so its gone. I’m tired of there being no adults in the room, just a bunch of grubby hands reaching for the shiny.

    • w2qw@aussie.zoneEnglish
      1·
      11 months ago

      Would you remove dividends too? What would be the incentive of investing in companies?

  • Xariphon@kbin.social
    21·
    11 months ago

    It’s not about not being able to.

    It’s about choosing not to, literally “because fuck you, is why.”