Can’t afford to. Having lived in a tourist hotspot my whole life, I’ve been trying to get out since I was 18. The amount of homelessness and drug use/addiction is insane - highest amounts in the entire state, and there’s a stretch of road in the state capital called Methadone Mile.

Something happens once an area becomes a popular enough tourist spot: the economy stops getting a boost from tourism and simply becomes tourism. Everything becomes focused around catering to tourists, and 75% of businesses either close outside the tourist season or massively cut their hours and employees. The town I live in has 3 business sectors: restaurants, retail, and retirement homes. There’s another town here with a year-round population of 4,000 that can get up to 60,000 during the 4th of July holiday.

And these are the same complaints that I’ve heard countless times from people that I’ve talked who lived in other tourist areas. Rampant homelessness and addiction, and poor job opportunities.

So you can kindly fuck off with that snarky comment, you’ve clearly never lived in a tourist town yourself.

US media loves to go on about the horrible working conditions in China, claiming 11-hour days and all kinds of other sweatshop working conditions because nothing sells like a good tragedy, but nobody talks about the working conditions at home and talking amongst ourselves is often made difficult, either by cultural or business practices. It’s illegal to punish employees for talking about how much they make with each other, but that doesn’t stop businesses from doing it anyway, because people here simply don’t know their rights as a worker and companies love to take advantage of it. So we think we have a clear grasp of how the Chinese live while still believing that people here work 40-hour weeks and somewhere in the cultural zeitgeist is still the belief that people can afford a house with a white picket fence, a dog/cat, and 2.5 kids on one person’s salary.

The thing I learned about China when I was on Twitter years ago is that it’s how visible you are about it. There’s a code of conduct that lets you say and do the thing even if you should get in real trouble for it. I followed a Chinese lesbian who was big in the 3d printing world, and she talked about how there’s lesbian bars and her girlfriend, but she’s married to a man in the same way that they used to do here in western countries. They call them a Face, and they’re guys who are either gay or have some other arrangement with a lesbian so they can both satisfy the cultural/legal marriage expectations while living their own lives.

Not to say that it’s all sunshine and rainbows over there. It’s still pretty dystopian. She also talked about how she had been grabbed by the police, black bagged and thrown in an unmarked van to be held and interrogated multiple times. They couldnt do more than that, though, because she was really untouchable despite being open about a lesbian because of her popularity on Twitter. In a lot of ways, it reminds me of Western nations before the 80s or so when things like Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell were more codified in law.

Edit: I think I got my terms wrong and the guy is called a Beard, not a Face. Like you’d wear a fake beard to hide your face or something, I think.

I think this still weighs more than 28 lbs

Andrew Wimmer was handcuffed and taken to jail on January 22, 2003 because he refused to protest in a ““designated protest zone”” that was out of sight of the President as well as local and national TV news cameras.

A woman, armed with a ““We Love You Bush”” sign showed up at the same corner shortly after Wimmer’s arrest. Wimmer asked the police if they were going to arrest her if she didn’t move and they said, ““no.”” The police also allegedly blocked the national press camera crews and an AP reporter from approaching the protest zone to do reporting.

https://www.aclu.org/documents/dissent-forced-be-out-sight-and-out-mind

I wish I remembered where those studies were, but the Bernie one was from a news poll or something during the 2016 primaries, and the rest from Harvard and the like were from even before then, IIRC. I do know there was an article making the rounds just the other day about a similar study to the Ivy League school ones about how the US can be considered an oligarchy, but I didn’t look at it.

As you say, policy is less important than what Fox News tells them. My grandfather and my first boss when I was in high school were both life-long Republicans who had the exact same answer when asked who they were voting for: they’d look at you like you asked them a stupid question and respond, “I’m a Republican. I vote for the nominee.” These are people who have had a strawman fed to them their entire lives of who “the enemy” is and vote entirely on that feeling and what the guy with an R next to their name tells them they should be opposed to. We have 70 years (and going) worth of Red Scare propaganda that lets them rile up the cult with scare words like socialism and communism. There was a great story from a few years back of a trans woman in New Hampshire who used that mindless voting block to her advantage to get elected county sheriff on a defund the police policy with one simple trick: nobody from the Republican party was running for the position, so she signed up as the Republican nominee and won in a landslide from all the people who didn’t bother to read up on the candidates and just showed up to vote for whoever had the R next to their name.

Speaking of policy, though, I think one of the big stumbling blocks we can add to the pile for why people don’t get out to vote and vote against their interests is how difficult it can be to access the info on who is running for what and what their policies are. Hence why people just listen to Fox News on who they should vote for. I can say from personal experience anecdotally from working with kids whose families were staunchly Republican during the 2016 primaries that they were shocked to hear what Bernie’s actual policies were and that they agreed with a number of them - like legalizing marijuana.

The Harris campaign blamed “identity politics” for their loss - even though they made no promises on trans rights and only mentioned trans people in passing.

The rest I agree with, except for maybe the idea that there aren’t enough of us. Studies show that 60% of the population is more left-leaning than the government at any given time, and many Republican voters agreed with Bernie Sanders’ policies in 2016 (so long as you told them the policies before telling them whose they were). We are stymied by a system that makes our votes as unimportant as it can, followed up by making it as difficult to vote as it can.

Another key issue the Dems have is that they never promise more than they think they can achieve, and in this recent election, didn’t speak to the issues people care most about. They didn’t talk about the ever increasing issue of the average person’s dwindling income, while Republicans promised the moon. It doesn’t matter that Republicans lie, because what people want is change, and they promised them that. The last time we had a Democrat run on a campaign of hope and change, we had the largest voter turnout in history. Harris campaigned on how much moderate Republican politicians liked her, and her support in swing states dropped immediately afterward.

Thanks, it was actually largely inspired by the vibe of Tumblr and people like Strange Æons when I made the account.

I live by the saying “become unmarketable” nowadays, and it seemed fitting to that vibe.

Yeah, it’s really the fact that I am even saying that I might have a system with an AMD CPU and an Intel GPU running Linux that throws me for a loop. I’m pretty sure I can learn to handle any of that, but that is certainly not a sentence I would’ve expected myself to say 10 years ago.

I wish I had the studies in front of me for the stats, but studies done by schools like Harvard have shown that the US cannot be considered a democracy (technically, we’ve been a republic anyway) and has been an oligarchy since at least the 70s. Nobody gets their way all the time, but since the 70s, laws have been passed in favor of the wealthy twice as often as the majority. You can easily pick out examples for any side, of course. Like I said, nobody gets their way all the time.

I never meant to imply that the Dems are as bad as the Republicans, anyway. Just that they act as a stop gap in the push ever right. There are those among them who are actually actively fighting against the flow as well, but overall, they are the party of the centrist/moderate status quo, and they hamper the more progressive side of the party when they can. There are a few in office who side with Republicans more often than not. Even the ACA, as great as it has been, was cut to be more palatable to Republicans before they ever even saw it. What we got is a very neutered version of the original, which I will forever love to remind Republicans was based on Romney-care, a policy created by a Republican governor of one of the most left leaning states in the nation. A Republican who was re-elected and is still looked upon favorably to this day for his actions while in office.

Before the current MAGA party, the biggest difference between the two parties was that Dems largely believed in equal rights and strong regulations, and everything else was largely arguing over the minor details like just how strong those regulations should be, tax brackets, etc. Like you said, both parties still believe in Neo-Liberalism.

Personally, I think the Dems (the leadership, in particular) just don’t really care to fight because they believe they have golden parachutes just like the CEOs when they bankrupt yet another company in the name of short-term profit. The Dems were more than happy to throw trans people under the bus this election, and then blame them and “identity politics” when they lost. They seem to think that nobody who matters will be hurt in the next 4 years and people will come crawling back to them in the next election. And if we still have free and fair elections in 4 years, they’ll probably be right about the second part.

Ultimately, the Democrats have a leadership issue more than anything, and a changing of the guard is in order if we are going to solve the problems at hand. Our politicians are largely old and out of touch.

Apparently, US manufacturers don’t use geofencing at all, so it was never difficult in the first place. This just means one more manufacturer who doesn’t.

Me, with an AMD CPU and Nvidia GPU, who is expecting to maybe upgrade to an Intel GPU this year and swap to Linux: visible confusion

We truly do live in the weirdest timeline.

The Dems have been “reaching across the aisle” since before I was born. How’s that working out? 20 years ago, racism was couched under the guise of “it’s just a joke.” 10 years ago, the racists and transphobes were screaming about how they were getting canceled for their views on their TV specials. Today, members of the incoming administration have openly called for the genocide of trans people (their words, not mine).

America has always been deeply bigoted. It’s just out in the open now. And with my life on the line, the only thing I’m reaching across the aisle with is a loaded gun. The time for reconciliation is past. It’s time to make Nazis afraid again.

I recommend this primer video by Strange Æons, who also has tons of great videos on all kinds of Tumblr Icebergs and drama and all kinds of good stuff.

100% Serious Tumblr Etiquette Manual

God gave us grain but not bread so that we, too, could indulge in the joy of creation.

I mean, a lot of news outlets are owned by the same groups funding politicians on both sides and far right think tanks. After 9/11, somebody bought up over 500 local news channels with the express purpose of running more anti-Muslim news.

There isn’t some big conspiracy going on, but the facts of US politics are that since Reagan, the laws have been made based largely on the whims of the rich. More often than the majority, at least. And what do the rich want? More money. And dumb, angry people have been great for revenue. So the rich make decisions to benefit their bottom line, and politicians are beholden to their corporate sponsors, and it all leads down the rabbit hole of grifters and tech bros and all. Not in some long con conspiracy, but in idiots chasing infinite growth and infinite profits with no thought for 2 years down the road.

I think there’s a big issue with Dems in their messaging, both in style and who they platform to, but the extremists have an advantage here: people think emotionally, not rationally. So if your job is to tell people that it’s not their fault their lives suck, it’s the fault of (insert minority group here), that’s going to be a lot more palatable to people than “Biden added 500,000 jobs to the economy during his presidency” when much of the country have to choose between food and heat this week.

I also agree with the neo-liberalism (also, both sides-ism and centrists), but I think that also can be partially blamed on the Dems, and also our culture in general. The Dems have been the party of “reaching across the aisle” since before I was born, and my entire life it has only allowed things to get worse. The Dems clearly have a losing strategy, but they’ve tried nothing and they’re all out of ideas because they refuse to let truly progressive candidates lead the party for fear of giving up their power/positions (and their corporate sponsors).

That’s fair. Not everyone is good at Little League, after all. 😉

There’s some overlap

Personally, I think Valave has no reason to try to compete with Windows right now, regardless. Steam has a market capture that the Xbox store could only dream of, even with gamepass, and SteamOS expands their market into new areas outside of the Windows PC group.

I could also see a Streisand effect/TikTok to Red Note if Microsoft tried to prevent people from installing Steam where they draw more attention to SteamOS and people start jumping ship for other options - whether that’s SteamOS or not.