• silence7OPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    What are insurers supposed to do when the risk of a large area has changed?

    • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Idk, but pulling out to leave their customers completely fucked probably isn’t the right answer. At that point, the rest of us pay the “insurance” through disaster relief, and we might as well just cover insurance with taxes nationally. Cut out the middle man and their cash grab entirely.

      If they can’t figure out a solution that works, and keeps everyone covered, they simply shouldn’t exist since they aren’t providing the service they claim to.

      • silence7OPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m not sure there is much option - a bunch of risk which was once statistically independent isn’t now, and therefore isn’t the kind of thing where insurance can be financially offered at a low price. We’re going to see either insurers stopping sales or much higher prices.

        • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Ok, but again, then it should be nationalized and just paid as part of property tax, or a tax paid mostly by the rich who caused this problem in the first place, instead of generating profits for a company who exists for the sole purpose of generating profits by not paying out when stuff happens.