• silence7OPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    A few reasons:

    • Spending significant amounts of money needs congressional support and the Republicans control one house of Congress
    • Changing laws requires not just a majority, but a 60% supermajority in the Senate
    • The US regulatory process is designed to be slow, and the EPA lost most of its staff under Trump, so they prioritized the low-hanging fruit
    • echutaa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sounds like it’s probably not going to happen then if all the stars have to alight to get it.

      • DrugsMcChrist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        funny how real change is just on the horizon but always out of reach. almost as if it were by design

      • silence7OPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s not so much about the stars all aligning, but needing to hold a majority of the centers of power for long enough. We’ve gone from being blown off to not having the votes to do anything at all to getting significant but not yet sufficient action. Getting to where we need to be is going to happen at some point, and it’s on us to make it happen sooner rather than later.

        • echutaa@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I envy your optimism, but this just sounds like an empty promise with a built in scapegoat. What makes you so sure this will happen?

          • silence7OPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m not. It takes electing more and better Democrats instead of lurching into fascism. We could well fail, but it’s crazy to not try

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            It is hypothetically more likely to occur when folks who want it to occur are employed/elected than when those people are specifically absent

    • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Also, opportunities for different policies are determined by the political cycle. Bold policies are usually done at the beginning of a term, presidential or otherwise because they know they’ve got the American people behind their back. They were just elected after all.

      Mid-terms are usually when they focus on the economy and other things closer to normal people so that when the election roles around, what that politician did will be more salient in the voter’s mind.