• Track_Shovel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    9 months ago

    Massacring civilians is fine, but occupying is a bridge too far, I guess.

    • drdalek13@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      I definitely get your point here, but a ground invasion would be irreversible. They would never leave Gaza

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          They didn’t demand evacuation back then. They invaded, killed a bunch of people, declared victory, then left (obvious oversimplification). This time, they ordering the civilian population to leave seems to be an indication they expect to invade, murder stragglers, then annex the land once it’s empty and leveled. It does seem to go along with the rhetoric of “exerting a price they’ve never dreamed of”.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            It’s very much a price the Palestinians dream of though. Israeli settler groups did exactly that in 1947.