• null
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not asking whether or not he had a right to speak there.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nobody said that he has a right to speak there. The students have a right to invite him to speak there.

      • null
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not sure how that’s relevant to the question I asked.

          • null
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Whatever that means.

            • stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              It means that you don’t want to converse, you just want to be angry. It was a mistake of me to attempt it with you.

              • firewallfail@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Go back and reread this conversation. Nothing you’ve said has been relevant. There was never a question about him being allowed to speak it was about whether there was value to him speaking.

              • null
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Not sure how making irrelevant statements constitutes conversation, or how wondering how they’re relevant means I’m angry, but okay, bud. Run along.