• Prunebutt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    There are so many factual errors in their comment tho.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Good things you stated some? Why not have an actual discussion instead of a pissing contest?

      • Prunebutt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That stuff is not free, for example. The energy and water usage is simply not economical.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I said basically free. It costs a fraction of a cent to generate an image, that would take a human a few hours at least.

          • Prunebutt
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            What if I tell you that the effort that gets put nto the image is a vital part of art?

            • Tja@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Well, that’s your opinion. I’m more of a finished product kind of guy.

              • Prunebutt
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                You just said it: you value more the “product” part of art. Not the “art” part.