• iiGxC
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    28 days ago

    Could also have a system where multiple arbritrators separately decide on a case, say 3 arbitrators per dispute by default, and if there’s a disagreement, more arbitrators decide until above x% of them agree on the resolution

    • nihilist@monero.townOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      28 days ago

      yea but if all the arbitrators are corrupt on the network side, no matter how many you put on the arbitration the outcome wouldnt really change right ?

      • iiGxC
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        True, and any rewards to the arbitrators would be less and less if they get divided equally