BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agoAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square315fedilinkarrow-up1419arrow-down10
arrow-up1419arrow-down1imageAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square315fedilink
minus-squarePrunebuttlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·1 month agoMy point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
minus-squareretrieval4558@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoAnd how does that relate to angels?
My point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
And how does that relate to angels?
They don’t exist either.
We agree there