• dx1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    People have a real way of finding the single most negatively-portrayable thing about a person and using it to smear their entire legacy. Post-humously. That page was written Dec 2002 according to the archive, which would make him a month over 16 years old when he wrote it. In the context of an argument in favor of having unlimited free speech, not a dedicated page on his website to “I want child pornography”.

    • exscape@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s also the last of the points, which he ordered from least to most controversial.

    • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Well, free speech is more about the ideas than actions or words. He would be excercising free speech by stating that such free speech should be unlimited, but his infamous example wouldn’t really be a valid one