The New York Times notified an undisclosed number of contributors that some of their sensitive personal information was stolen and leaked after its GitHub repositories were breached in January 2024.
  • The New York Times suffered a breach of its GitHub repositories in January 2024, leading to the theft and leak of sensitive personal information of freelancers.
  • Attackers accessed the repos using exposed credentials, but the breach did not impact the newspaper’s internal systems or operations.
  • The stolen data, amounting to 273GB, was leaked on 4chan and included various personal details of contributors as well as information related to assignments and source code, including the viral Wordle game.
  • helenslunch@feddit.nlEnglish
    14·
    11 days ago

    Or did you assume it was GitHub itself that was compromised?

    That’s the way it reads to me.

    My guess is plain old phishing.

    Going back to my previous comment, if it was obtained through fishing, there would be no need for “hacking”.

    • BURN@lemmy.worldEnglish
      51·
      11 days ago

      “Hacking” is a catch all term for security breaches, including phishing to the general public.

        • BURN@lemmy.worldEnglish
          61·
          11 days ago

          Yes it is. You can be a pedantic a-hole all you want, but “hacking” includes phishing, social engineering and pretty much any other form of access control circumvention to the general public.

          Edit:

          Also from the article itself

          A ‘readme’ file in the archive states that the threat actor used an exposed GitHub token to access the company’s repositories and steal the data.

          Exposed GitHub token is very likely someone messed up and either exposed a token or was victim to an attack that could pull the token. Those are not uncommon and have happened to a lot of companies.