Offshore Wind Resources Could Meet 25% Of US Demand::Offshore Wind Resources Could Meet 25% Of US Demand

  • los_chill@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    This always makes me wonder… the tide has to be one of the biggest sources of free kinetic energy, cycled daily. I can picture a hundred different ways to tap it for free energy. Why aren’t we doing it?

    • Proweruser@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Salt water is a bitch. It will corrode though everything, especially moving parts. It’s not that we couldn’t do it, but the maintenance cost makes it unattractive.

      • reallynotnick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Make it all out of whatever offshore windmills are made of (ok I say this half jokingly because I honestly have no knowledge in this area)

    • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Because it is anything but simple.

      Years back, senior year design project was exactly this. There are a millions ways to harvest energy, but to do it economically is incredibly difficult. To do it efficiently and reliably makes it that much more difficult. And then storing the energy to be used later adds even more cost and complexity.

      The money spent on trying to generate power from tidal waves is ultimately better spent on other methods. There are (or at lest there were) test wave generators in Spain or France (if my memory is correct) but I don’t think they were ever truly commercialized.

    • neutronicturtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You basically need a few conditions to be met to make this useable: tide needs to be high enough, there needs to be suitable geological formation that enables building of such power plants, it has to be publicly acceptable to build there, and you need to connect it to the grid. The last two can especially cancel eachother out.

      However, this assumes you use potential energy. What you are envisioning might be more like current power (so kinetic energy) where I’m not sure what the limitations are. Perhaps it’s not too practical to build huge plants underwater in locations with relatively constant current and connect them to the grid

    • freecandy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      It isn’t “free,” in the sense that the energy is part of regular climate cycles. Wind farms, for example, will disrupt downstream climate patterns if deployed at large scale and in concentrated areas.

    • freecandy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      It isn’t “free,” in the sense that the energy is part of regular climate cycles. Wind farms, for example, will disrupt downstream climate patterns if deployed at large scale and in concentrated areas.