• goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    They deny the Holodomor and Uyghur genocide. As well as paint Stalin as a benevolent leader.

    • Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      11 months ago

      I am, admittedly, not very educated on the specifics of the Uyghur genocide, though I’ve tried to read the reports covered by the news. Ultimately I think there is much we don’t know about the situation, which I think to some extent is a legitimate point of critique for the Chinese government. Holodomor on the other hand is something that is debated even in academic circles:

      While scholars are in consensus that the cause of the famine was man-made, whether the Holodomor constitutes a genocide remains in dispute.

      The quote is from Wikipedia, but also found in various formats in other sources. Now, the actual important point: Do you think their alledged stances on these questions make them evil? Because people are more complex than that, and I think the comment I linked above should tell you everything you need to know why they are also on Lemmygrad and also tell you that they are indeed not a bad person.

      • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Taken from Wikipedia:

        In 1948, the United Nations Genocide Convention defined genocide as any of five “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.” These five acts were: killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births, and forcibly transferring children out of the group.

        So, while there may be debate on whether the Holdomor technically meets the definition of a genocide, it still constitutes mass murder.

        • Urist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          11 months ago

          That is not necessarily true because it is not easy to establish intent. As far as I know there is not a clear idea on even the numbers, only estimates that have been quite far apart. I do not think there is adequate grounds to conclude that it was done with intent, nor to rule it out, hence why it is under debate.

          • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah, but man made famines still aren’t okay, even if you don’t intent to destroy a people.

            • GerryMandering@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Would you consider the frequent man-made famines in ireland in the 19th century, including the very famous great famine, an example of ‘genocide’ or mass murder?

            • Urist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Of course not and I think the most valuable we can learn from history is how to prevent something of the kind from happening again.

              • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                11 months ago

                That’s why we should steer away from authoritarianism, which is what these communities want.

          • Gxost@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Soviets took away all food from Ukrainian villages. They searched for hidden compartments, they probed the ground, so it wasn’t possible to hide food. They didn’t allow picking leftover grains from fields. What is the probability that the famine was unintentional? I doubt it was a big surprise that people without food starve and die.

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            What about Canadian genocide of the indigenous? Surely you count that?

            • PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Canada recognizes its multiple genocides against the First Nations. We have days dedicated to indigenous Canadians and activly trying to put indigenous voices first.

              The same can’t be said about China, Russia or the US.

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Would someone who denied, say, the Holocaust not be a bad person because of their ‘alleged stances’?

        You want to go home, and rethink your life.

            • Urist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Uhm, I do not think you have a good understanding of what I am saying if you think I do not care deeply for the Ukrainian people both then and now. I understand that it is upsetting to debate something as horrible as what happened, but that is also why it is important to try to get the narrative right.

                • Urist@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I think it is debatable to some degree and I am not an authority on the subject. I would rather listen to someone more knowledgeable than myself talk about it.

        • Brocken40@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          At some point you gotta live with em, you can try to tell a tankie or a Trumper the truth and they’ll nod along politly but still get drunk and spout nonsense. as long as they ain’t starting a militia or beating they wife might as well let the old dog bark

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s irrelevant if they themselves are in their hearts are evil. People in powerful positions who leverage that power to diminish the historical importance or even existence of a genocide (or, for you, merely an intentional man-made famine directed specifically at a subset of a population deemed undesirable that resulted in millions of deaths) are acting as a force of evil.

        Waving your hands and uttering the incantation of “we can’t know if they are evil” doesn’t disappear specific evil actions.

        And, good actions don’t “cancel our” the bad ones either. Volunteering at a soup kitchen doesn’t give you a free pass to beat your wife.

        Each action is evaluated within it’s own context.