• jochem@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s bought by Avast. I immediately uninstalled it when I learned about the news. No way that they don’t want get a return on investment by e.g. selling your data.

    Consent-o-matic is better (actually sets the minimum amount of cookies) and is developed by university employees, whom I trust more.

    • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Why not just add the I don’t care about cookies list to ublock origin? The list itself is fine. It’s the extension that I wouldn’t touch with a 10 foot pole. They can’t collect your data without the extension…

      • Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        It sometimes breaks sites because it just blocks the dialog, but doesn’t actually answer what the dialog wants to know (i.e. reject all cookies).

        • exu@feditown.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          Technically websites must not track you before you consented to the cookies, but I’m not confident most sites implemented it this way :/

        • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          That makes sense. It’s probably an unnecessary list at this point to be honest. Also lmfao at Avast buying that extension. That sucks.

    • axo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Consent-o-matic doesnt really work though. Have been using it for a year but went back to the community i dont care about cookies addon

  • Racle@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    10 months ago

    IIRC, that doesn’t block cookies, it just blocks cookie warnings.

    I personally use Consent-O-Matic nowdays.

    I don't care about cookies sometimes broke website.

    Never had that issue with Consent-O-Matic which automatically rejects all cookies while still making site usable.

    • Gamey@feddit.rocks
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I definitely have to check that out, is it another one of those “we can’t reject consistant enough so we will just accept half of the banners” tho?

      • Racle@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        It doesn’t accept banners / popups. When that doesn’t know how to handle things, it just leave it to user to handle.

        Most of the time it just works as intended.

  • moreeni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    10 months ago

    uBlock Origin has filters to block cookie pop-ups. I consider the extension a must anyway, no need to download another one like IDCAC or Consent-o-matic

  • Gamey@feddit.rocks
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 months ago

    Didn’t that just accept most cookie banners? Sounds like a horrible idea to me unless you auto clear cookies all the time!

    • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      From https://github.com/arkenfox/user.js/wiki/4.1-Extensions

      `Cookie extensions

      ❗️Sanitizing in-session is a false sense of privacy. They do nothing for IP tracking. Even Tor Browser does not sanitize in-session e.g. when you request a new circuit. A new ID requires both full sanitizing and a new IP. The same applies to Firefox
      ❗️Cookie extensions can lack APIs or implementation of them to properly sanitize
          e.g. at the time of writing: Cookie Auto Delete` 
      
      • pipes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is true but if you open tens of websites as many people do every day (some keep them open for months!), what kind of monstrous VPN setup should you have to have tens of IPs?

        I don’t think there’s a realistic solution other than using TOR as much as you can bear…

        CookieAutoDelete and Temporary Containers fool 99% of websites and trackers, especially with uBlock Origin it’s the best you can get without losing convenience…IMHO

    • pipes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      But all the incognito tabs share the same “container”, if you keep a lot of tabs open like me, try the Temporary Container extension with automatic mode. Also CookieAutodelete on Auto (it deletes cookies and local storage after a tab is closed for e.g. 15s)