(unpaywalled version on archive.today: https://archive.ph/03cwZ)

Interesting figure that comes out of the article: 87% of US teens prefer iPhones. Also the explanations given aren’t quite surprising, I guess it’s mostly because of iMessage. Teens will feel like outcasts if they get an Android phone while their friends still use iMessage because of the green bubbles.

It’s actually hilarious how we allowed consumerism to take us this far and that we have now peer pressure over smartphones.

“You’re telling me in 2023, you still have a ’Droid? […] You gotta be at least 50 years old.”

ouch 😔

  • cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m amazed it’s 2023 and we’ve still not universally adopted a protocol better than SMS. Thanks Apple

    • HarriPotero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      We have all universally adopted Rich Communication Services, which is an open standard.

      Well, except for Apple. They haven’t adopted it.

      • cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        11 months ago

        Apple’s refusal to cooperate is both obviously profit motivated and infuriating. They’ve engineered this social gulf between iPhone and non-iPhone users. I often wonder about the collective social harm.

        The low res photos and video are natural byproducts of squeezing modern media into an SMS message, but the ‘green’ bubbles take it to another level. The worst part is that the average iPhone user at best is apathetic. Meanwhile Cook suggested last year that we should just buy more iPhones as a solution.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          yup. buy apple products, it’s the classism of our age to look down on poors who can’t afford the apple logo.

          such actual garbage.

      • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Crossing my fingers that the eu æaq that forces 3rd party app stores etc, on iphones, can fix it

    • Schlemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      11 months ago

      In 2024 Apple and Google will have to figure it out because the EU are twisting their arms.

    • Joris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s 2023. Why use SMS in the first place? The world except the US has moved on years ago.

      • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Because open standards that don’t require specialized software have many advantages… Why would you prefer proprietary software in the first place?

        • kugel7c@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Because it provides a better experience, weather it’s WhatsApp telegram, Signal threema or even discord or teams, they all provide a significant feature advantage over SMS. This starts with properly handling multimedia, not giving your number up to everyone else, proper groups, your messages living in the cloud for proper multi device functionality, your messages living unencrypted only on your device… There is plenty of real advantages with their associated side effects.

          SMS as a standard is simply too old for modern expectations, this doesn’t make modern expectations stupid just because the standard is not being kept up to date. I have not written a single SMS since 2013 or so, and my life is better for it. Also there is definitely open third party chat apps that provide an open standard that can just be installed as one of a few apps, the problem here is that potentially no one is using them.

          The main advantage of a computer in your pocket against earlier phones is that you can fundamentally install any software you want, not just what the device manufacturer deems acceptable, so why would anyone not take advantage of this for messaging is beyond me.

          • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            You just listed mostly things that already exist with sms or should exist as a standard and some of them, Google has tried with RCS but companies like apple actively refuses adoption. Yeah, you can install apps but ideally you’d not be required to, it would be a choice. Sending a text message ought to be a standard process. This is a lot of hate for the idea of standards dude.

            • kugel7c@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              The thing is it’s a specific standard that just hasn’t kept up, you shouldn’t be married to any software, and you should be able to decide yourself what you use, I can’t change what big tech does with their software, but I can call people stupid for not using the ability of their computers to run custom software.

              I despise the trend of people not realizing what they legitimately can do with their hardware, because they were just too scared to install software. I so often stumble upon people who can’t accomplish simple tasks because they are terrified of installing software, and this messaging thing is definitely one of these issues.

              Essentially if you are given a library of software, and you have a problem that is solved by installing software, why would you not install software, it’s mostly free, and requires only the briefest thought about what you want and where you can find it.

              • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                You’re entirely missing the point. Communication systems ought to be standardized and mostly has been. You’re acting like you can magically install apps on your relatives and friends phones if you want to.

                I have zero fear of installing incredibly custom software and honestly do so most days…

                Not sure how someone this intelligent can so easily get lost on the idea that communication happens on a network, not on one device, and therefore standards help interoperability… It’s sort of bizarre

                • kugel7c@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Yes I can’t do shit about communication systems not being standardized to the degree I’d like and with the features I’d want.

                  So what I try to do is try to bully people until they use an app that everyone can be relatively happy with, SMS is essentially the only one I don’t accept because it’s 20 years old and doesn’t behave sensibly for the modern area.

                  I can understand that standards help interoperability but realize that for SMS, obviously that has failed because apple has rejected RCS for now and developed a default experience that is better. I don’t control any of that shit. I can just tell people to install chat apps if they want to talk to me. And I can bully them if they don’t.

                  The network is a network of communicating software so the standard can be installed by default or after the fact, it doesn’t make a difference if everyone would just install software. Being angry at apple or WhatsApp or whatever for not writing a messenger you like is sorta stupid, they are companies they’ll never do what you want, being a angry at users that refuse to use options freely available to them can at least improve the situation for me because they can install what I, or they want to use.

                  • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    At least you know you’re a bully but otherwise I can’t agree with a word of this. I’m not bullying my mom into using an app because her photos are shitty res. It’s rude and pointless. It won’t work. Also if it did I’d still be an asshole but an asshole providing tech support for a new thing. Being a bully is a bad thing fyi

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah but typically when people come into these threads going “huhuhu stupid Americans with their SMS” it turns out they’re on WhatsApp, like much of the rest of the world. Which is just hilariously stupid.

        • Joris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Don’t be ignorant. There are a lot more options, safer, open and with more features than sms/iMessage.

      • LaughingFox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m in the US and my thought is that it’s easier to use sms because not everyone uses Signal, not everyone uses Telegram, and those types. If they did… One person would prefer Snapchat, the other would prefer Signal… Too many choices. With SMS, it’s just your phone number, and everyone has a phone number.

        Otherwise you gotta get usernames for different people for different apps… It’s too complicated.

        • Joris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s not username based, it’s based on your phone number. I really don’t get what’s holding people in the US back to move on. Because these arguments don’t apply at all.

          I think Snapchat is more a social media app than a messenger by the way.