• silence7OPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Lots more detail about the Montana climate lawsuit here.

    It’s not so much about promotion of fossil fuels, as the state being required to consider the impact when they approve new extraction projects.

    • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      district court struck down a provision in the Montana Environmental Policy Act that barred the state from considering climate impacts when permitting energy projects

      This provision was to promote the use of fossil fuels. It’s not just that they weren’t required to consider climate impacts before, but they were straight up banned from considering them.

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      So, if they “consider” it, is that enough to qualify even if they choose oil over greener choices?

      I just think we are so far beyond the need to “consider” things. We need to “reverse” things, and yeah this is good, but it’s never going to be enough at this rate.

      • silence7OPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I agree that there needs to be zero new extraction or other fossil fuels infrastructure. I’m dubious that the current Montana legislature would allow that.

        • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          So, not to dismiss the youth from trying, this lawsuit’s impact really did nothing and it’s not actually “paving the way” for anything—more like glancing up from a phone and eyeballing the direction.

          Thoughts and prayers! 🙃

          • silence7OPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s the first of many to go to trial. So I’d have to disagree

            • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Well, I hope you’re right. I am just not very optimistic that we can do enough in time.