PeterPoopshit@sh.itjust.works to > Greentext@lemmy.ml · 10 months agoAnon gets his iPhone battery replacedsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square145fedilinkarrow-up11.48Karrow-down145
arrow-up11.44Karrow-down1imageAnon gets his iPhone battery replacedsh.itjust.worksPeterPoopshit@sh.itjust.works to > Greentext@lemmy.ml · 10 months agomessage-square145fedilink
minus-squareAdo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·10 months agoWhy is that sad? I can understand why companies don’t want to pay just to get a certification when the phone itself is up to standards regardless
minus-squarekamen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·10 months ago“It’s easier to make the phone waterproof if the battery is not user-serviceable” is a common argument; if it’s really true, way more phones should be waterproof even if not IP-certified (which understandably costs money and raises the end price).
minus-squareZiemekZ@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoSamsung Galaxy S5 would like to have a word. IP67 while having user-detachable battery cover.
minus-squarekamen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 months agoOne of the very few phones like this.
Why is that sad? I can understand why companies don’t want to pay just to get a certification when the phone itself is up to standards regardless
“It’s easier to make the phone waterproof if the battery is not user-serviceable” is a common argument; if it’s really true, way more phones should be waterproof even if not IP-certified (which understandably costs money and raises the end price).
deleted by creator
Samsung Galaxy S5 would like to have a word. IP67 while having user-detachable battery cover.
One of the very few phones like this.