• Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The highlands of scandinavia should be safer than most and might suit them, with rømmegrøt and hallingdans on Hardangervidda

    • Lifted_lowered@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Pacific Northwest is probably okay that’s why we are trying to build dual power to replace the government when it collapses and fight the Nazis who want to do the same

        • Lifted_lowered@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Do you live here? Probably okay means survivable, literally over a billion people will die if they can’t move from the unsurvivable parts

          • RegularGoose@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I don’t need to live in a place to know that heat domes, droughts, and rampant wildfires do not describe a place that’s “probably survivable.” You will not be able to live there 15-20 years from now.

            • Lifted_lowered@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I both live there and am planning to survive, and keep as many people alive with me as I can, have fun with whatever you’re doing buddy