• PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve used GNOME for a year now.

    I don’t understand people calling GNOME keyboard-driven, it doesn’t even support keyboard shortcuts for more than 4 workspaces, and it doesn’t support tiling other than left and right.

    I also feel like the plugin system is not great. The plugins break on every.single.update and you have to beg the maintainers to update them.

    I agree about a dock/taskbar miss me with that :P

    What frustrates me about GNOME is that it’s otherwise so well-polished and smooth but just refuses to be easily customizable.

    • wolii1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Gnome is definitely keyboard driven, this is my workflow: Use Super + type name to launch apps, then tile them left and right with Super + Left and Super + Right. Two apps are enough for a workspace, if you need more, move to a new workspace using Super + Alt + Right. Gnome automatically creates new workspaces as you go, so you always have enough space. Swap between apps using Super + Tab. Almost like a tiling window manager, right?

      The plugin system is indeed very good, extensions can do pretty much everything. They break on an update because it makes sense: The author designed the extension for a specific version of Gnome, and it can’t be guaranteed that it still works as intended on a newer version. You surely don’t want an outdated extension to really mess up your desktop when it hasn’t been properly updated. This is the safe way.

      And regarding customization? Funny story: when I started with Linux and I wasn’t really into the meta yet, I started with KDE, but I switched to Gnome (GNOME 3.xx and GTK3) because I found it EASIER to customize. Gnome themes always looked way better than they looked on KDE and they were never bugged (e.g. missing contrast, wrong iconography). Also “extensions” were way less bugged than KDEs equivalent features. I only later found out that people preferred KDE because of its customization. However, I do agree that with Libadwaite, they really put an end to Gnome theming, but all in all, I think it’s better because of app uniformity and an easier app development process (you can really see the Gnome app ecosystem flourish). Also, Adwaita looks pretty amazing nowadays, I don’t really feel the urge to theme my desktop.

      • nxdefiant@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Heh, this is literally my workflow. I’ve been using gnome3 since release, and gnome2 before that.

        They need to make the Audio switcher and gTile extensions part of “core” gnome, and then it would be perfect.

        • wolii1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Do you mean an audio output/input switcher? Because they added one a few version ago.

      • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        What’s the keyboard shortcut for switching to workspace 5? There isn’t one. And you can’t configure one either. That just blows my mind

        • wolii1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I have never felt the need to use more, also I mainly navigate with Super + Alt + {Left,Right}.

          Though Gnome workspaces are not intended to be used like they are on a tiling window manager; you should just use the workspaces you need and dynamically create them and move apps. Assigning an app to workspace 10 that just stays there all day until you need it ist not the intended workflow.

          • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.deOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Sure, but this is exactly my biggest problem with GNOME, it’s one specific workflow and anything that is even just slightly different is out of the box.

            Don’t get me wrong I have many positive feelings about GNOME but they’ve recently been overtaken by the negative ones :P

    • MashedTech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s what I fucking hate about it, great extensions, couldn’t fucking settle on an API that doesn’t break every update. When will the gnome devs ever be content with themselves

      • cole@lemdro.id
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        there is no API, which is the problem. It’s just straight code injection. That’s why extensions can be so powerful. A stable API would compromise their freedom for sure

        • MashedTech@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Okay then, I’m never gonna update gnome again I guess. The machine I use it on is for work, so I care about stability. Or should I have never chosen gnome in the first place?

          • cole@lemdro.id
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’m not sure that is a fair reaction. If your workflow relies heavily on many complex extensions that have a history of updating slow it is probably worth just… waiting a bit? You don’t HAVE to be on the bleeding edge of Gnome releases. With a fairly minimal extensions list I’ve not had problems updating to new releases for a long long time

      • wolii1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s just the logical conclusion of continuing development. And even if the API stays the same, the shell might function differently, which could lead to extension bugs, therefore it is safer to break them all until the extension developer validates it for the new version.

        You could of course force the internal stuff to be the same, but this would just stifle development and innovation.

        In my opinion, if you can only use Gnome with extensions, you shouldn’t use it in the first place. Personally, I do have extensions, but they do so little that I don’t have a problem waiting a week or two until they update. Extensions don’t influence my workflow, they just are small quality of life adjustments (e.g. hiding the battery indicator when docked to my monitor and fully charged etc).