• Michal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    What if while you sleep over it your laptop gets stolen or damaged? I’d rather push every small change than sit on it.

    • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I would lose max 3 hrs of work that I already know how to re do. I can live with that. I don’t want to publish too much unfinished/unpolished work. There is always the chance someone might need the branch.

      Even if drafts under development, I like to publish something that reaches the standard of my “best” me, not my “Friday evening” me

        • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Because someone else might need to work on something on or from my branches. And I don’t want garbage in my history. There are cases I might not be able to squash merge, so all my history will be in the project history. I want each commit to be clean. It is not a lot of effort, and forces me to increase code quality, because I review my code more often.

          Rules for all projects I manage: never rebase published branches and always publish clean code (even implementation is unfinished).

          From experience following these simple rules make the whole project management easier and more effective

      • Michal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        On one occasion i had to take over a task from a colleague while he was on his day off. He did not push his changes. I am sure he had backups but when i asked him to push his changes he had to drive home to do it.

        I’d rather company IP stays on its git server.