• Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ah, so when someone transitions from woman to man and have a penis grafted on them, it makes them a man? Good on you to be so progressive.

    • random65837@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Its doesnt “make” them a man, they ARE a man. I could care less if people want to switch sides, but pretending you’re no longer what your biology dictates is stupid.

      If theyre a women, go get pregnant and carry a child to term, when I see that, theyre a woman.

      Its not about politics, its not about religion, its about biological fact and commom sense.

      Being “progressive” doesnt include ignorance of reality.

      • MyFairJulia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well… Guess a lot women turn out to be men. We didn’t see them carry a child. Perhaps they will carry a child at some point, perhaps they won’t. But until then you can’t trust a single woman to be a woman until they have born a child in front of you.

        You may want to get used to the idea that you’ve been attracted to men all along. I can help you with your coming out.

      • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Today I learned infertile women are men. Women without children are men. Women who adopted but didn’t get pregnant and carry their children are men. Got it.

        See how it’s not that cut and dry?

      • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        There is a difference between biological sex (male/female) and social gender (man/woman). Feel free to make this the hill you die on, if you’d like. My hill is the left fawning over tolerance for Islam without understanding that it’s an exclusivist fundamentalist proselytizing religion that has no sizeable liberal movements. There is no version of Islam that is like the Unitarians, UCC, etc where the holy book is understood to be a product of its times. Sufism is close insofar as their mysticism makes them chill, but they’re not universalists. I have no desire to import proselytizing religionists of any culture or creed, and certainly no tolerance for the same.