After decades of climate deception, Shell uses Fortnite to court demographic most concerned about climate change::undefined

  • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    This person literally just means “for no additional charge” but typed free. They understand, they just don’t care. This is just unnecessary and pedantic.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ok. It’s not what they said, but if you are sure they meant what you are saying, then fine. I understand.

      I just prefer when people say what they mean and own a mistake when they are called out on it.

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s a common shortcut in at least some parts of the US to say “I paid for X and got Y for free” … everybody knows it really wasn’t “for free”. It’s just easier than “and got Y for no additional charge”, “and they didn’t charge me anything extra for Y”, etc.

        • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I appreciate that, but that’s not what was being said.

          They were saying that fortnite was free with an optional battle pass. Or you can pay for a package which gives you skins and coins and then the battle pass if free. But you aren’t paying for skins and coins and getting a free battle pass. You are paying for a battle pass, skins, and coins. That’s just the cost. There’s no deal or money off or “for no additional cost” it costs more to get the battle pass with the skins and coins.

          What you said might be true, but you are talking about something else. This person mis-spoke.

    • zaph@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      A similar tactic has Amazon in legal crosshairs. Free shipping for prime members is now being seen in a different light.