A homeowner is mulling the next step after a company mistakenly demolished a home she owned in southwest Atlanta.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is why companies need to have insurance.

    So something not adding up.

    You think someone wanted the land?

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think the house was abandon and she even claims it was boarded up. Good chance the county or city allowed this to happen. I have property in a county and the city council in a local town says that if your home looks abandon or trash they will seize your property clean it up then bill you for said clean up. He was very proud of this.

      Also how she says she spoke to attorneys and none will take her case and she in limbo means that she has no case and no recourse. I like to know why?

      • squiblet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t see where it said no lawyer will take her case. Just that there hasn’t been legal action yet.

    • Stuka@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      It goes way beyond insurance and monetary compensation. There needs to be criminal liability for destroying someone’s home.

      • jasory@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        If the building was in fact “boarded up”, then it might be hard to argue that it was someone’s home. At least in bankruptcy law inhabited places do have special protections against seizure.

      • Drusas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        The cops wouldn’t like that. They like to be able to destroy people’s homes with no repercussion.

        • ElleChaise@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I get that you’re being facetious, but even then they’d obviously have immunity if any laws changed. Cops always coppin’.

            • Whirlgirl9@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              i know the guy whose house was destroyed by cops in greenwood village in denver. they took it to court and effing lost. the cops additionally did $80k damage to the neighbor’s home. it’s one of the most rage inducing stories ever.