This guy is a hard core Nazi traitor who tried to violently overthrow our democratic government. He literally attended the coup kickoff meeting from before the election. He deserves 400 years in jail, not 4 months.

Come on justice* system, do something.

The hearing is on Thursday.

Ahead of the hearings, Schoen told Newsweek: “No matter where anyone stands on Mr. Bannon, everyone should hope the conviction gets reversed on appeal. It is a very dangerous proposition to hold someone criminally culpable and send them to prison without a finding that he or she ever acted in any way that he or she believed was against the law or wrong. That is what happened here.”

This guy is taking crazy pills like his client right? My (very non expert) understanding is that “I didn’t know it was against the law” is in no way a valid legal defense. Are there circumstances where that is not true?

Just leave him on a raft out at sea. Fuck that Nazi scum.

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Steve Bannon, the former White House chief strategist and a top Donald Trump ally, is set to discover whether his appeal over his contempt of Congress conviction will be successful.

Bannon was sentenced to four months in jail in October 2022 after he was convicted of two counts of contempt in connection to his failure to abide by a congressional subpoena issued to him by the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 attack.

Attorney Mark Romano, a frequent critic of Trump, condemned the length of time it has taken for Bannon’s appeal to be resolved after he was found guilty by a jury in July 2022.

“The ridiculously slow pace of the justice system is a reason so many people have rightly lost faith in it,” Romano posted on X, formerly Twitter.

Speaking to reporters last July after a jury found him guilty, Bannon confirmed he would be appealing the decision, adding: “We may have lost a battle here today, but we’re not gonna lose this war.”

Following the guilty verdict, Matthew M. Graves, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, said in a statement: "The subpoena to Stephen Bannon was not an invitation that could be rejected or ignored.

The original article contains 556 words, the summary contains 201 words. Saved 64%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

As much as I despise this dude and think he definitely deserves to be in prison for his role in J6, it rubs me the wrong way that somebody can be thrown in prison for refusing to testify. The first, fourth, and particularly fifth amendments were designed to protect against this even if courts have not interpreted them that way.

Sometimes refusing to testify is absolutely the morally right thing to do. Those who refused to rat on others during the McCarthy hearings did the right thing. Those who refused to testify to their knowledge of other people’s sexual orientation when being gay was a crime did the right thing. Those who refused to help the government locate and imprison people of Asian descent into internment camps did the right thing.

A person’s choice to testify is a check-and-balance on the power of the government, it must rely on people’s voluntary cooperation and their own investigative resources. People refusing to cooperate is a way to resist a prosecutorial effort or police force they find unjust, and it provides an incentive for the government to make sure it is doing the right thing all the time because they might need to lean on that goodwill later.

What exists in your head should be at your discretion to disclose, the government shouldn’t be able to throw you in prison simply because you refuse to talk, just as they can’t compel you to speak something you disagree with or worship a god you do not believe in.