Article 45 Will Roll Back Web Security by 12 Years
www.eff.org
The EU is poised to pass a sweeping new regulation, eIDAS 2.0. Buried deep in the text is Article 45, which returns us to the dark ages of 2011, when certificate authorities (CAs) could collaborate with governments to spy on encrypted traffic—and get away with it. Article 45 forbids browsers from...

EU Article 45 requires that browsers trust certificate authorities appointed by governments::The EU is poised to pass a sweeping new regulation, eIDAS 2.0. Buried deep in the text is Article 45, which returns us to the dark ages of 2011, when certificate authorities (CAs) could collaborate with governments to spy on encrypted traffic—and get away with it. Article 45 forbids browsers from…

  • ShunkW@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    8 months ago

    Yeah that argument holds zero water. Forcing browsers to trust these roots means not only pre-trusting them, but disallowing removal of trust. This is completely intended for surveillance purposes.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.worldEnglish
      11·
      8 months ago

      Removal of trust happened many times in the past. And like I said, it’s not changing anything other than making things easier. You can still add certificates to the browser trusted list if you have access to the person’s computer, which when you install any software you do. Perhaps the best middle ground would be to add certificates but make them conditional that is to say ask the user what they want to do and offer multiple options. Trust for this domain only, trust always, just this time, don’t trust.

      • ShunkW@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        8 months ago

        The current text of Article 45 requires that browsers trust CAs appointed by governments

        Tell me you didn’t read the article without telling me you didn’t read the article. You can keep shilling for government surveillance if you want, but I’m done listening.

        • MeanEYE@lemmy.worldEnglish
          11·
          8 months ago

          Am not shilling, am merely pointing out there are easier ways to spy on people without putting it through legal channels.

          • ShunkW@lemmy.worldEnglish
            11·
            8 months ago

            And another pointless argument. “They could spy on you easier means they’re not.”

            I know I said I was done, but good lord. I can’t tell if you are trying to troll or you’re completely devoid of logic or reason.

            • MeanEYE@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              8 months ago

              Okay, so you officially refuse to think and just want to wear a tinfoil hat. Good luck with that. Leave the rest of us out of it. Seeing conspiracy theories everywhere and then go online to argue and paying for bills pretty much negates everything you say.