Interesting graph. Surprising that sequestration in agriculture is projected to have such a big effect, but apparently at relatively high cost per CO2 equivalent.
I do note that the “cost lower than reference” part of agriculture mostly means “stop eating animals” because that lets you move a huge amount of agricultural land into afforestation.
Interesting graph. Surprising that sequestration in agriculture is projected to have such a big effect, but apparently at relatively high cost per CO2 equivalent.
I do note that the “cost lower than reference” part of agriculture mostly means “stop eating animals” because that lets you move a huge amount of agricultural land into afforestation.