• Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh, stop being sensationalist. A car is a car, that’s all it ever will be. It’s clear you didn’t even read the article because its not talking about remote kill switches.

    • ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Cars kill 43 000 people a year in the U.S.

      I’m talking about people’s reactions in this thread when they haven’t read the article. All of those people opposing a hypothetical “cop presses a button” remote kill switch are insane.

      Private citizens do not have a right to operating a motor vehicle any way they see fit. You license it, you license your skills, you get it looked at periodically and you use it on public roads with the state’s blessing only if you can manage to get along with other people using that same road. There is no sense opposing a kill switch for “freedom”.

      We can’t trust cops with their stupid car chases that result in crashes, and their maneuvers for flipping cars over on the freeway.

      You give them a killswitch

      • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I absolutely oppose universal kill switches and I’m not insane. Something about that pesky “innocent 'till proven guilty” thing. If you lose that privilege, you get a breathalyzer lock. That’s fair. But I haven’t used “smart” tech in a car that hasn’t bugged out in unpredictable ways and this won’t be an exception. Technology that overrides driver input is a risk to those the vehicle belongs and that’s unacceptable to me.

        • ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          “Innocent until proven guilty” has nothing to do with it. When a cop stops you he’s not indicting you. Switching your gas off remotely replaces chasing calling in reinforcements and chasing you over several blocks when you start speeding up, or flipping your car over. Both of those already impair or override the driver’s input quite a bit.

          Having the opinion that your driver input should override the cop’s order to stop, and that society should trust you to stop instead of putting a kill switch in your engine is an insane opinion, and prime driver entitlement.

          And I would love the same for drivers without insurance, license removals and cars that didn’t pass the tech inspection