• glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    It says they operated at a loss in SK. If that’s true, I wouldn’t wanna, either.

    • schmidtster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      43
      ·
      7 months ago

      Dang, stores better get rid of their loss leaders than.

      Sometimes you gotta take a small loss for the overall benefit of the company/system.

      • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        How is remaining in an unprofitable market a “loss leader”?

        Sometimes you gotta take a small loss for the overall benefit of the company/system.

        You really don’t think Twitch did some analysis on this matter before making a decision? Or do you just figure that your uninformed assumptions about their financials are more accurate than their internal analysis? Clearly whatever benefit they were or were not getting from their SK business was not enough to justify the operating costs.

          • roguetrick@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            They’re leaving the market. If anything Amazon is putting a shot across the bow of the ISPs who are charging these interconnect fees to get THEM negative press and make the Korean public demand a change in the laws so they can get the Internet they pay for.

            Amazon may be quitting twitch in Korea, but their cloud services are still paying for the dumb fees.

          • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            What negative press? They’re no longer going to do business in a particular market for completely normal reasons. This isn’t some kind of scandal, it’s a standard decision for a company to make regarding unprofitable operations. Everyone besides you seems to understand this.

            You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about.

        • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Neither does the person you’re replying to. They probably just learned the term “loss leader” and thought they’d sound smart bringing it up but have no idea how the concept actually works in practice.

      • DeepFriedDresden@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Loss leaders work because customers will purchase other products/services. Operating in a market at a loss isn’t what a loss leader is.

      • iegod@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Gaming nerds dictating how business should operate is one of the funniest things to observe.

          • cerement
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago
            • “corporation” + “bribery” “lobbying” … nope, never seen that before …
            • “corporation” + “breaking the law” … nor that one either …
            • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Correct, but those are both expensive in their own ways.

              If they don’t see a return they won’t do either.

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          Which would cost you more in the end, so if removing it costs more, you keep it in.

          That’s what’s a loss leader is……