• collapse_already@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Still, the worst thing you can do for the environment, especially if you are a first worlder (as most reading this are), is have a child.

    Stopping burning fossil fuels is much harder than it sounds. We need fertilizer from Haber-Bosch, we need tractors, we need trucks shipping food to population centers. Without fossil fuels, I know I am one of the billions that starve. I will probably eat some neighbors first though.

    • silence7OPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      We can in fact do all those essential things without fossil fuels. For example, there’s a bunch of effort in the US, EU, and China to generate hydrogen via electrolysis from renewables, and then use that as an input to Haber-Bosch, and it’s backed by government policy and financial support.

    • LilNaib
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      We need fertilizer from Haber-Bosch

      Chemical fertilizer is not only unnecessary, it’s tied to poor agricultural approaches. In contrast, farmers who practice regenerative agriculture and/or permaculture don’t use it and get excellent yields. A specific example is Gabe Brown, whose farm gets above-average yields compared to neighboring farms and is far more profitable, not needing to take government handouts to stay in business. Meanwhile, the soil at his 5,000 acre farm is far healthier and sequesters many tons of carbon per acre vs. neighboring farms.

      For more info, read the book Dirt to Soil by Gabe Brown. You can also read a bit here:

      https://soilhealthacademy.org/team/gabe-brown/