• Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Subsidizing solar may help with climate change, but a better choice would be taxing carbon dioxide emissions in proportion to the actual damage that they do. If coal and gas were taxed according to their actual harm, the market price of electricity would increase to its fair price, and make solar viable without needing the government to organize it. However, due to battery costs and short battery lifespans, I suspect the free market would pick nuclear over solar.

    • silence7OPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      The reason you subsidize solar first is to create a viable path for people to get off fossil fuels. If they don’t see that, the carbon tax looks like a problem instead of something they can live with.