On “The Other Place” I remember seeing lots of threads about your favourite line, joke or quote in the series. And those threads were fun, but ultimately it’s always the heavy hitters being repeated over and over.

So my question to you, Lemmings and Kbinauts, is what is your favourite underrated line in the series? Something that makes you laugh, or makes you think, every time but you never see talked about?

Yes, this whole thread is just an excuse to post about how much I adore the following description from Moving Pictures:

It looked like a large, ornate pot, almost as high as a man of large pot height.

Honourable mention goes to my second fave, also in fact from Moving Pictures and the best side character in the series:

Sunnink dreadful in there, he thought. Prob’ly tentacled fings that rips your face off. I mean, when you finds mysterious doors in old hills, stands to reason wot comes out ain’t going to be pleased to see you. Evil creatures wot Man shouldn’t wot of, and here’s one dog wot don’t want to wot of them either.

I’ve read both of these gods know how many times, and still laugh out loud every single time.

Go on, share your favourites!

  • thegiddystitcher@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think this concept comes up again in later books too, right? Maybe Jingo is what I’m thinking of but then again maybe not. Anyway, I’ve always liked this idea too and have definitely repeated it irl as a genuine theory to various bemused bystanders.

    You ever use a quote or concept so much you forget you didn’t make it up yourself? Maybe that’s a whole other thread topic in itself lol.

    • xuxebiko@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Vimes “Boots” theory is like that for me. A semester course worth of socioeconomics in 1 line.

      The Boots theory from Men at Arms - “The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. … A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that’d still be keeping his feet dry in ten years’ time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.”