• Legendsofanus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow image-hosting is a thing. Why don’t they just have something so essential out of the box, is it expensive or something

    • Choco1ateCh1p@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It requires a lot of storage space. Much more than for just text.

      Also, additional liability for hosting images uploaded by literally anyone, that could depict abuse, or be copyrighted.

    • thecdc1995@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Short answer is yes. Long answer is that with text it’s much easier to stamp out illegal activity because keyword searches are cheap while semantic searches in images are pretty good but extremely computationally expensive. You can’t just scan for illegal activity in images the same way you can nigh instantly scan a body of text for “illegal-site.com”.

      • Legendsofanus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That makes a certain kind of sense but does that mean the filtering algorithm Facebook uses that targets NSFW photos in posts and group chats is very complicated and expensive? is it important for a site like reddit or Lemmy to scan for illegal activities oj a photo?