• floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    He has done some good things, but the best way for Biden to have helped the planet in the longer term would have been to step aside for a younger and more energetic candidate in this year’s election.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think there would’ve been a ton of political power in the incumbent naming his successor and dumping all of his campaigning energy into promoting the successor for the election. Unless of course he picked someone with as terrible of a voting record as himself, in which case we’d be in the same position, just with less risk of the POTUS being forced to step down due to age-related health concerns or just keeling over on the job

        • silence7OPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t think that’s nearly as effective as you’d think. Any plausible Democrat will be exposed to the right-wing smear machine, knocking down their popularity. It’s a gamble with much worse odds than running again.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Biden has accomplished a lot more than lesser experienced people in the job. I was skeptical, and didn’t vote for him in the 2020 primary, but he’s far exceed my expectations. I’m not sure a more progressive candidate could have actually gotten more progressive legislation passed.