• federalreverse-old@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Huh. It does read like that. But I just copied the format that @craftyindividual uses for the date of the artwork rather than the birth/death date of the painter.

      • federalreverse-old@feddit.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s surrealism, so it’s not meant to be realistic. Likely, the candles are returning to nature but that’s my guess. It might just be the user(s) of these candles instead.

        Magritte’s work frequently displays a collection of ordinary objects in an unusual context, giving new meanings to familiar things. […]

        René Magritte described his paintings as “visible images which conceal nothing; they evoke mystery and, indeed, when one sees one of my pictures, one asks oneself this simple question, ‘What does that mean?’. It does not mean anything, because mystery means nothing either, it is unknowable.”

        Wikipedia

  • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    I love Magritte, but I’ve never seen this one before. It’s pretty great. Always nice to see something new from a favorite artist.

  • MalReynolds
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    And now I realise I’m missing ‘The Lair of the White Worm’, Ta!

    This also goes into my art collection (do you not?) because it’s mad, bad and … excellent generative fodder. Also Ta.