A coalition of 22 state attorneys general is calling on Congress to address “the glaring vagueness” that has led to legal cannabis products being sold over the counter across the country …

A coalition of 22 state attorneys general is calling on Congress to address “the glaring vagueness” that has led to legal cannabis products being sold over the counter across the country — including sometimes from vending machines or online.

A letter dated March 20 addresses the consequences of Republican lawmakers’ choice to legalize hemp production in the 2018 omnibus Farm Bill — a decision that perhaps inadvertently led to a multibillion-dollar market in intoxicating cannabis products that are arguably federally legal.

Now, the attorneys general want Congress to shutter the market it helped create. In the new Farm Bill, they want the legislature to enshrine in statute the idea that intoxicating cannabis is not federally legal — contrary to what the law currently states.

  • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
    35·
    3 months ago

    Wow, practically everything you said is wrong, and it illustrates how you really don’t understand how this works.

    Lol, I own and operate a CBD based company. I am well aware of the laws.

    The Controlled Substances Act

    And how does rescheduling conflict with the controlled substance act? They’ve already done their due diligence, as I said you may have had a point prior to the HHS recommendation, but according to the controlled substance act setting new rules/rescheduling is the next step.

    The FDA has made its recommendation, and now the DEA has to make a recommendation for final approval.

    It’s not the food in drug administration, its the department of health and human services that makes the recommendation. Again, you have no idea what you are talking about.

    And, no, just because Biden has the power to fire the head of the DEA doesn’t mean he has the legal authority to force them to come to a determination he favors. That’s just ridiculous.

    He can just fire them if he doesn’t and hire someone he knows will follow orders. You’re just being pedantic.

    That’s the process as laid out by the Controlled Substances Act, a law passed by Congress, which lays out, in very specific detail, the process for this. And no matter what you insist, the president cannot shortcut this process nor force a decision either way.

    First of all, the initial process of drug scheduling is laid out by the controlled substance act, but not how the rules are changed or modified. That’s handled under the purview of the administrative procedure act. According to both of these bodies the only thing left for them to do is have the DEA actually rewrite the rules, or reschedule.

    The only reason the head of the DEA hasn’t done so already (she has made pro cannabis rescheduling remarks) is because the executive is holding off for a bigger impact for the election.

    And no matter what you insist, the president cannot shortcut this process nor force a decision either way.

    Lol, what short cut? The job is done, it’s just waiting for a signature. You don’t even know what the process is, what agencies are involved, or even the difference between rule making and law making. Stop pretending that you have any kind of actual experience in this field.

    • gregorum@lemm.eeEnglish
      43·
      3 months ago

      I am well aware of the laws.

      You have very clearly demonstrated that you are, in fact, not.

      The FDA is part of the HHS, btw. Which, of course, you would know if you r really did “know the law” as you claim.

      I’m tired of explaining this to you, as I have over and over again. And I’m sorry you just refuse to accept the fact that you’re wrong. But you are, nothing you said your change with that.