• 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Some better software to stitch it together and some higher res cameras, the Quest 3 could do what the Vision Pro does. The Quest 2 was just enough that you could get around the room. The Quest 3 you can actually read a book or a screen through. It’s just a bit blurry and wonky from the panorama being stitched together and the fact the cameras aren’t as good.

    I think people would sacrifice a little bit of quality for an affordable product that can literally do all the same stuff. Actually, the Quest can do a bit more considering the software library for the Vision fuckin sucks and doesn’t have much at all.

    Then again, people also just want these things to be like putting on sunglasses and not strapping a literal computer to their face looking like a cyberpunk nightmare. And I don’t think we are anywhere close to Google Glass form factors with Apple Vision Pro quality picture.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Some better software to stitch it together and some higher res cameras, the Quest 3 could do what the Vision Pro does.

      they’re definitely chasing apple on AR interaction and in some ways (ML trained hand tracking) I think Meta is ahead.

      Still doesn’t make me want to work with either meta or apple stuff though.