• Tramort@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    some_guy is stating that he was excluding high risk recipients in order to juice his own success rates (simpler patients means better outcomes)

    • DODOKING38@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Is that a bad thing? Like If you had a choice between 2 patients but one had a higher chance, which would you choose?

      • Tramort@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes; it’s bad because it’s dishonest.

        It’s not about which specific rules they follow: it’s about the importance of WHATEVER rules are chosen, and the whole community following them.

      • skozzii@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah that how it should work but he was probably putting poors ahead of the rich which is a big no-no its today’s capatalist America.

        Rich get good treatment, the poors get to fight for scraps.