• duncesplayed@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The big difference between [the WWW] and Hyper-G is Hyper-G’s distributed link server. This server keeps track of all the relations (e.g. links) between Hyper-G objects, allowing for automatic maintenance of the information network. For example, when an object gets deleted, the link server will be able to find and delete all links pointing to the object. In contrast, in Gopher and WWW there is no easy way to find out what other documents are pointing to a given document

    Dear God that sounds horrible and amazing. I’m glad it didn’t catch on, but I really want to see it in action.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The first sentence made me think that maybe it’s something ideologically similar to IPFS and Locutus, but yes, horrible.

      • theolodger@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I believe it is because it can automatically (depending on the browser) start a download…

        • signaleleven@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d like to hear from @aperson@beehaw.org, but if you are right then it’s those browsers that are “not cool”, and linking a PDF is not the problem.

          • theolodger@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            So would I - it does not seem like it would be too much of an issue, though I have seen people complaining about such things in the past…

    • duncesplayed@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree. I don’t think it’s the world’s responsibility to cater to someone’s bad browser configuration.