• restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t get why companies pull such shady crap to get behavior data. 99% of it is useless and never even is used to make improvements to products or processes.

      • wirehead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        2 months ago

        More to the point, the company using shady means to collect the data does not need to care if the data is useful, just that it’s marketable.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        A lot gets used. A lot doesn’t. The technology is designed with trust in mind that it won’t be abused. It completely is. We should really be redesigning protocols to not be intrusive. A lot of information is given that is no longer needed to be functional.

  • Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have seen certain links on the internet, where,

    The text reads “example.com”, and when you hover over it, the little textbox at the bottom left also reads “example.com

    but if you click to open the link in a new tab or if you right click and copy the link and paste it in the address bar, it’s actually a completely different link

    it’s shady af! and im wondering if it’s the same thing as what this article is describing, and if not, how they are able to do it?