Anyone can ask the SCOTUS to consider their case. But they usually decline.

As the article points out, Coca Cola isn’t shipping syrup to Russia.

But it does ship syrup to China, which means Russia can get it.

That’s true. So it’s not hard to believe that Hamas is diverting aid to itself, and at least partly responsible.

Hamas doesn’t care about Gazan civilians. They are a “necessary sacrifice”.

A 21% stake in a company is not control of that company. Especially when Kar-Tess, a private holding company, has an equally large stake.

And when Coke left Russia, did you expect them to burn down their bottling facilities and kill their employees?

The same Russian people are working in the same Russian plants, so it’s no surprise the new product tastes like the old one.

After Coke pledged to quit Russia, other companies started importing Coke products and making Coke knockoffs.

How exactly is this Coke’s fault?

So you think Hamas is not interfering with food delivery?

They didn’t say nobody in Gaza is starving.

“If there was a famine somewhere in Gaza, it was not instigated by Israel.” … The research underscores that while sufficient food enters Gaza, its distribution within the territory is inconsistent, largely due to sabotage and theft by Hamas.

The AMA does not issue or revoke medical licenses. In this case, that decision would be up to the state of Texas.

Just a figure of speech. But getting an eviction proceeding in your rental history report is like getting a bankruptcy in your credit history report.

It’s actually from one the reports that OP made into a screenshot upthread.

Maybe they didn’t want you to read the rest.

I’m grumpy about being forgotten in the generational sniping

Every generation grows up, settles down, and starts quarrels with its parents.

In 10-15 years, Zoomers will remember you.

Wrong again.

UN:

Based on the examination of available information, including credible statements by eyewitnesses, there are reasonable grounds to believe that multiple incidents of rape, including gang rape, occurred in and around the Nova festival site during the 7 October attacks

UN:

Credible information based on corroborating witness accounts describes an incident involving the rape of two women.

UN:

There are reasonable grounds to believe that sexual violence occurred in kibbutz Re’im, including rape. This included the rape of a woman outside of a bomb shelter at the entrance of kibbutz Re’im

The first screenshot is from here

The second is from here

If you read both reports instead of cherry-picking quotes out of context, you’ll find they both conclude that Hamas sexually assaulted Israeli women.

Nah.

Hamas raped hostages. Hamas are rapists. They’re worse than the Catholic priests. At least priests don’t point guns at their rape victims.

And her account hasn’t changed, you just didn’t bother to read all of it.

That’s not what they said.

Read it more closely. This is literally in the same report:

Based on the information gathered by the mission team from multiple and independent sources, there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred during the 7 October attacks

That’s completely false.

the Commission documented cases indicative of sexual violence perpetrated against women and men in and around the Nova festival site, as well as the Nahal Oz military outpost and several kibbutzim, including Kfar Aza, Re’im and Nir Oz. It collected and preserved digital evidence, including images of victims’ bodies displaying indications of sexual violence, a pattern corroborated by independent testimonies from witnesses.

Sexual violence is not always rape.

JFC, this sounds like something the Catholic Church would say after another priest is caught fondling little boys.

As far as I’m concerned, sexual assault means rape. As far as I’m concerned, anyone who does this is a rapist:

the guard, who called himself Muhammad, put a gun to her forehead, beat her and dragged her to a child’s bedroom. “Then he, with the gun pointed at me, forced me to commit a sexual act on him”

Judges have the authority to apply the law.

When two laws are in the books that happen to contradict each other - which they often do - judges need a method to determine which law to apply and which to ignore. They can’t apply contradictory laws simultaneously. It’s not some special authority. It’s simple logic.

Nothing in the Constitution says “When a new law directly contradicts an older one, apply the newer one and ignore the older one.” Judges could ignore the newer law, but they have wisely decided that in those circumstances they will ignore the older law.

Nothing in the Constitution says “When a law directly contradicts the Constitution, apply the Constitution and ignore the law.” Nor does the Constitution say “When a law directly contradicts the Constitution, apply the law and ignore the Constitution.” But judges must choose one or the other.

In other words, at times judges either must ignore the law or must ignore the Constitution. Again, this is not some special authority, it’s simple logic. In those circumstances judges consistently choose to ignore the law.

“Judicial review” is nothing more than a judge ignoring a law. Because if they can’t ignore that law, then they must ignore the Constitution. So what you’re really asking is “Why are judges always required to obey the Constitution?” But that’s the same as asking “Can anything give judges the power to ignore the Constitution?”

Nice screenshots.

Is there something in the first report that you didn’t show us?

the Commission documented cases indicative of sexual violence perpetrated against women and men in and around the Nova festival site, as well as the Nahal Oz military outpost and several kibbutzim, including Kfar Aza, Re’im and Nir Oz. It collected and preserved digital evidence, including images of victims’ bodies displaying indications of sexual violence, a pattern corroborated by independent testimonies from witnesses.

Huh.

Is there anything more in the second report?

Based on the information gathered by the mission team from multiple and independent sources, there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred during the 7 October attacks