Never really worked with them (we never made them).

I think they’re lower prize threshold cat Bs.

In the UK, slot machines fall into 4 main categories. Of particular interest are category C machines, as these can remember a fixed number of previous games. I.e. the “myth” that a machine is “about to pay out” because “someone lost a lot to it” can hold for these games.

Cat A and B machines are completely random, previous games can have no impact on probabilities of winning (though pots can climb).

Online games have different rules, not always fair ones!

Oh, and ALL games (in a physical location) must (by law) show “RTP” (return to player) somewhere. It usually gets stuck it in a block of text in the manual since no-one reads them. (If it’s below 97.3% just go play roulette as it offers better returns).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Im4YAMWK74

Relevant follow-up (videos explore Korean gender politics and hierarchical society).

Wow… They want to give AI even more mental illness and crippling imposter syndrome to make it an expert in one niche field?

Sounds like primary school drop-out level thinking to me.

The best we can say for that chart is that there is some relation (not necessarily casual) between GDP and mathematical education levels.

The causal factor could be anything - but it’s a damn pretty curve. It at least suggests that measuring a country’s gdp can give you a ballpark figure for it’s mathematical education levels.

Might be a novel premise for funding to explore if math is a causal factor.

You know, this thread really needs a list of of the publishers responsible for this travesty.

“Publishers Hachette Book Group Inc, HarperCollins Publishers LLC, John Wiley & Sons Inc and Penguin Random House LLC” - According to Reuters

You definitely have a point; informing and evangelising are closer than we’d like to admit. Then again, the messenger is often as important as the message - in the case of the vegan debate too many folks choose the moral option rather than the pragmatic one.

As a species, we find it hard to empathise with the death of our own at massive scales, why would we be capable of doing it for organisms we were brought up to consider food?

However, almost all of us are on a massively reduced budget, it’d be a shame if folks shared delicious recipes that can be made cheaply and just so happen to be vegan right?

The next best thing for a non-vegan to do isn’t to switch right away, it’s to start finding vegan things you enjoy more than meat!

Sorry to hear that, I hope things start looking up in the future.

Happy trails!

To enjoy life as a vegan?

The best thing for a vegan to do is to keep being a vegan. Seriously, just keep on doing it.

It doesn’t mean evangelise, it doesn’t mean denigrate, it means just carry on doing what works for you.

If you’re insulting other folks, or trying to push a lifestyle, odds are folks don’t dislike you because you’re vegan.

Capitalists AND Reviewer 2… Never underestimate the power of Reviewer 2 in publication!

Alas, I do have a plan involving retirement. It is filed under “things that happen to other people”.

The probability I’ll survive to retirement age is negligible, why worry about it?

1. Make it too big to fail
2. Wait for the fall while enshittifying
3. Cash in on the bail out
4. Go to 2

Mathematics Lecturer (just teaching foundation mind).

It’s far more fun than people think, but with next to no real holidays (summer is actually quite busy). Also it sucked being on temporary contract, because you had no idea if you’d have work in 12 months no matter how good you were.

Good to know.

Now here’s a thought - what if the real workaround Google are using here is targeting only non manifest V3 users?

That would reduce the cost of doing this, since chrome users are already forced to swallow ads and could just be served as normal.

Boozy Bay, it has an export industry in adventuring parties due to the booming tavern industry.

Yes they do, they skip parts definitely.

It all begins with a compromise.

I’m old, old enough to remember YouTube before it had ads. Hell, old enough to remember it before Google bought it out.

The first compromise was banner ads, they were the first and they were the norm.

Banner ads got too invasive, so we blocked them. YouTube came a-crying.

We compromised, we allowed an advert on the first video we watched. It was skippable of course.

We compromised again, we allowed more ads to creep in, all skippable.

Again, with unskippable ads we compromised and allowed short 5 or 10 seconds ones.

And here we are, “pay premium or deal with an unwatchable ad infested mess”. We block the ads because they are enshittification - they denigrate the service we signed up for, and if Google didn’t have the power to keep altering the deal, they’d have voided their contract with us years ago.

So no, I’m not going to pay you for wonders made by dedicated people - you harvested and sold my data years ago, and my Hotmail inbox’s unending wall of spam is testament to your unrelenting greed.

I did my time, got shafted in the deal, no more compromises.

Displaying ads on or within - definitely

Modifying content and distributing the modified content? That’s a trickier one.