No no, thats a bad interpretation. What he said was essentially “can we get retribution for person I dont like?”. Thats all, theres not much more to think about
So i was thinking about this again, and I was wondering… do you think this might be taken to the Supreme Court as it might be infringing on the 4th amendment as an unreasonable seizure? Would that be why they are holding off? Is there any standing on that
I just looked it up, apparently Jack Dorsey made a new Twitter like chat service and everyone is bending over backwards to see. Its a new twitter clone made by the guy who made twitter.
This is the comment I wanted to see. I feel like this case might be used later as an example of what not to do. Yes he is an asshole but thats his brand, take that away and he wont be able to be good on paying. The only way out is him serving life in prison over this but i think thats unprecedented.
The points that the article suggested were political refugees and NATO weakening due to US isolation starting from Obama. Not sure how xenophobia or removal of rights has anything to do with how Canada operates.
But i know I was asking how to determine far right so thats fair. As of now, I cant tell the difference between right and far right. What I usually expect to hear is anything that isnt chosen by progressives is far right lately.
61·9 months ago
13·10 months ago
No no, thats a bad interpretation. What he said was essentially “can we get retribution for person I dont like?”. Thats all, theres not much more to think about