![](https://slrpnk.net/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.world%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F0a7b5781-ddec-4e5b-86ad-ed019add9697.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/727cd730-d3bc-40f3-8cdd-ee1e5e993798.png)
Edit: I have since realized that I am unsure on the calculation of tax burden is calculated for the chart.
I am skeptical of the representation of the data. My sense for ways to skew data is set off when making statements of segments of population when the segments are not comparable.
I would need a better understanding of the calculation of the values reported to be able to justify that the top 20% are split into smaller groups than they’re being compared to.
TLDR; the non-monogomous community has a generally lower tolerance for the toxic social norms common among cis-het men. A man that finds himself impatient with his success in dating might consider that it makes sense for non-men to be cautious of all men, and he might need to do the work to recognize he might be the one that needs to learn what others expect of him to be found attractive.